Cited by 194Morphological variations and asymmetryForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology StudiesOrthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Hierarchical nature of morphological integration and modularity in the human posterior face

Bastir, Markus, Rosas, Antonio·2005·American Journal of Physical Anthropology

Abstract

Morphological integration and modularity are important points of intersection between evolution and the development of organismal form. Identification and quantification of integration are also of increasing paleoanthropological interest. In this study, the "posterior face," i.e., the mandibular ramus and its integration with the associated midline and lateral basicranium, is analyzed in lateral radiographs of 144 adult humans from three different geographic regions. The null hypothesis of homogenously pervasive morphological integration among "posterior-face" components is tested with Procrustes geometric morphometrics, partial least squares, and singular warps analysis. The results reveal statistically significant differences in integration. Only loose integrative relationships are found between midline and lateral components of the basicranium, which may indicate the presence of at least two different basicranial modules. This modularity can be interpreted in terms of spatiotemporal dissociation in the development of those basicranial structures, and gives support to hypotheses of independent phylogenetic modifications at the lateral and midline basicranium in humans. In addition, morphological integration was statistically significantly stronger between the middle cranial fossa and the mandibular ramus than between the ramus and the midline cranial base. This finding confirms previous hypotheses of a "petroso-mandibular unit," which could be a developmental consequence of well-known phylogenetic modifications in coronal topology of the posterior face and base in hominoid evolution, related to middle cranial fossa expansion. This unit could be involved in later evolutionary tendencies in the hominid craniofacial system.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajpa.20191

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patterns of covariation and correlation between different parts of the cranium are partially independent, suggesting they behave as partially independent units.

    “In fact, different studies have shown that the patterns of covariation and correlation between different parts of the cranium are partially independent, thus suggesting that they behave as partially independent units [15,39–42].”
  • Morphological integration is not absolute but organized in units that are relatively independent while participating to generate a structure that acts as a functional whole.

    “Nonetheless, this integration is not absolute but organized in units that are relatively independent while participating to generate a structure that act as functional whole.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 79 · Cited by 194

Authors
Bastir, M., & Rosas, A.
Affiliations
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
Corresponding author
Bastir, Markus
Venue
American Journal of Physical Anthropology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-08-15
Volume
128
Issue
1
Pages
26-34
ISSN
  • 0002-9483 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-8644
OpenAlex
W2124343261
Cited by
194
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 11
FWCI
13.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Physical Anthropology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Kagoshima University
  • Division of Materials Research
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Keywords
morphological integration, modularity, mandibular ramus, basicranium, middle cranial fossa, craniofacial development, hominoid evolution, skull base
MeSH terms
Adult, Anthropology, Physical, Biological Evolution, Face, Humans, Mandible, Skull, Cranial Fossa, Middle

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review