Hierarchical nature of morphological integration and modularity in the human posterior face
Abstract
Morphological integration and modularity are important points of intersection between evolution and the development of organismal form. Identification and quantification of integration are also of increasing paleoanthropological interest. In this study, the "posterior face," i.e., the mandibular ramus and its integration with the associated midline and lateral basicranium, is analyzed in lateral radiographs of 144 adult humans from three different geographic regions. The null hypothesis of homogenously pervasive morphological integration among "posterior-face" components is tested with Procrustes geometric morphometrics, partial least squares, and singular warps analysis. The results reveal statistically significant differences in integration. Only loose integrative relationships are found between midline and lateral components of the basicranium, which may indicate the presence of at least two different basicranial modules. This modularity can be interpreted in terms of spatiotemporal dissociation in the development of those basicranial structures, and gives support to hypotheses of independent phylogenetic modifications at the lateral and midline basicranium in humans. In addition, morphological integration was statistically significantly stronger between the middle cranial fossa and the mandibular ramus than between the ramus and the midline cranial base. This finding confirms previous hypotheses of a "petroso-mandibular unit," which could be a developmental consequence of well-known phylogenetic modifications in coronal topology of the posterior face and base in hominoid evolution, related to middle cranial fossa expansion. This unit could be involved in later evolutionary tendencies in the hominid craniofacial system.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Patterns of covariation and correlation between different parts of the cranium are partially independent, suggesting they behave as partially independent units.
“In fact, different studies have shown that the patterns of covariation and correlation between different parts of the cranium are partially independent, thus suggesting that they behave as partially independent units [15,39–42].”
From Morphological consequences of artificial cranial deformation: Modularity and integration (2020) · cites this paper as [15]
Morphological integration is not absolute but organized in units that are relatively independent while participating to generate a structure that acts as a functional whole.
“Nonetheless, this integration is not absolute but organized in units that are relatively independent while participating to generate a structure that act as functional whole.”
From Morphological consequences of artificial cranial deformation: Modularity and integration (2020) · cites this paper as [15]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 79 · Cited by 194
- Authors
- Bastir, M., & Rosas, A.
- Affiliations
- Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Bastir, Markus
- Venue
- American Journal of Physical Anthropology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-08-15
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 26-34
- ISSN
- 0002-9483 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-8644
- OpenAlex
- W2124343261
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 79
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 13.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Physical Anthropology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Kagoshima University
- Division of Materials Research
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
- Keywords
- morphological integration, modularity, mandibular ramus, basicranium, middle cranial fossa, craniofacial development, hominoid evolution, skull base
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Anthropology, Physical, Biological Evolution, Face, Humans, Mandible, Skull, Cranial Fossa, Middle
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review