Cited by 61Primate Behavior and EcologyEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorFace Recognition and Perception

Allometry of facial mobility in anthropoid primates: Implications for the evolution of facial expression

Dobson, Seth D.·2009·American Journal of Physical Anthropology

Abstract

Body size may be an important factor influencing the evolution of facial expression in anthropoid primates due to allometric constraints on the perception of facial movements. Given this hypothesis, I tested the prediction that observed facial mobility is positively correlated with body size in a comparative sample of nonhuman anthropoids. Facial mobility, or the variety of facial movements a species can produce, was estimated using a novel application of the Facial Action Coding System (FACS). I used FACS to estimate facial mobility in 12 nonhuman anthropoid species, based on video recordings of facial activity in zoo animals. Body mass data were taken from the literature. I used phylogenetic generalized least squares (PGLS) to perform a multiple regression analysis with facial mobility as the dependent variable and two independent variables: log body mass and dummy‐coded infraorder. Together, body mass and infraorder explain 92% of the variance in facial mobility. However, the partial effect of body mass is much stronger than for infraorder. The results of my study suggest that allometry is an important constraint on the evolution of facial mobility, which may limit the complexity of facial expression in smaller species. More work is needed to clarify the perceptual bases of this allometric pattern. Am J Phys Anthropol, 2009. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajpa.20902

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Allometric factors may influence zygomaxillary morphology when comparing smaller and larger individuals, given the association between body size and facial size in primates.

    “It is possible that allometric factors influence the zygomaxillary morphology when comparing smaller and larger individuals 37,38 given the association between body size and facial size in primates 39”

    From The evolutionary history of the human face (2019) · cites this paper as [39]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 74 · Cited by 61

Authors
Dobson, S. D.
Affiliations
Dartmouth College (US)
Corresponding author
Dobson, Seth D.
Venue
American Journal of Physical Anthropology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-08-18
Volume
138
Issue
1
Pages
70-81
ISSN
  • 0002-9483 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-8644
OpenAlex
W2051202151
Cited by
61
References
74
Citations by year
2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Physical Anthropology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
allometry, body size, anthropoid primates, body mass, facial action coding system, phylogenetic comparative analysis
MeSH terms
Animals, Cultural Evolution, Emotions, Face, Facial Expression, Facial Muscles, Fear, Gorilla gorilla, Humans, Hylobates, Macaca, Movement, Primates, Saguinus, Atelinae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review