Cited by 32

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Age estimation of archaeological remains using amino acid racemization in dental enamel: A comparison of morphological, biochemical, and known ages‐at‐death

Griffin, R.C., Chamberlain, A.T., Hotz, G., Penkman, K.E.H., Collins, M.J.·2009·American Journal of Physical Anthropology

Abstract

The poor accuracy of most current methods for estimating age‐at‐death in adult human skeletal remains is among the key problems facing palaeodemography. In forensic science, this problem has been solved for unburnt remains by the development of a chemical method for age estimation, using amino acid racemization in collagen extracted from dentine. Previous application of racemization methods to archaeological material has proven problematic. This study presents the application to archaeological human remains of a new age estimation method utilizing amino acid racemization in a potentially closed system—the dental enamel. The amino acid composition and extent of racemization in enamel from two Medieval cemeteries (Newcastle Blackgate and Grantham, England) and from a documented age‐at‐death sample from a 19th century cemetery (Spitalfriedhof St Johann, Switzerland) were determined. Alterations in the amino acid composition were detected in all populations, indicating that diagenetic change had taken place. However, in the Medieval populations, these changes did not appear to have substantially affected the relationship between racemization and age‐at‐death, with a strong relationship being retained between aspartic acid racemization and the morphological age estimates. In contrast, there was a poor relationship between racemization and age in the post‐medieval documented age‐at‐death population from Switzerland. This appears to be due to leaching of amino acids post‐mortem, indicating that enamel is not functioning as a perfectly closed system. Isolation of amino acids from a fraction of enamel which is less susceptible to leaching may improve the success of amino acid racemization for archaeological age estimation. Am J Phys Anthropol, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajpa.21058

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AAR has seen particular success in highly mineralized substrates that act as closed systems, such as mollusk and avian shell and tooth enamel, where intracrystalline amino acids should remain endogenous and predictable.

    “However, AAR has seen particular success in highly mineralized substrates that act as closed systems (26). Such substrates for analyses include mollusk and avian shell (11, 26, 27) as well as tooth enamel (13, 28), which are substrates where intracrystalline amino acids should remain endogenous and predictable.”

    From Ancient protein analysis in archaeology (2021) · cites this paper as [28]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. 10.2307/2694345 · DOI
  2. 10.1175/1520-0450(1995)034<2787:TQCOLT>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  3. 10.1002/jssc.200301681 · DOI
  4. 10.1520/JFS14062J · DOI
  5. Carolan VA, 1997, Archaeological Sciences 1995, 349
  6. Collins MJ, 2000, Perspectives in amino acid and protein geochemistry, 120
  7. 10.1098/rstb.1999.0359 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/B978-008044396-6/50008-3 · DOI
  9. 10.1002/oa.948 · DOI
  10. Dobberstein RC, 2005, Ist eine Revision der Aminosäurendatierung möglich? [Erlangung des Doktorgrades]
  11. 10.1111/j.1475-4754.1990.tb01082.x · DOI
  12. 10.1006/jasc.2001.0776 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.04.226 · DOI
  14. 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2008.00753.x · DOI
  15. 10.1038/262279b0 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/S0065-3233(08)60388-5 · DOI
  17. 10.1002/ajpa.1330690402 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/S0277-3791(97)00086-3 · DOI
  19. 10.1017/CBO9780511542428.004 · DOI
  20. Masters PM, 1984, Stereochemical age‐determinations for the Barrow Eskimo remains, Arctic Anthropol, 21, 77
  21. 10.1126/science.356264 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/B978-0-08-009823-4.50015-X · DOI
  23. 10.1097/00000433-199509000-00010 · DOI
  24. Ohtani S, 1988, A study on the use of the amino‐acid racemization method to estimate the ages of unidentified cadavers from their teeth, Bull Kanagawa Dent Coll, 16, 11
  25. 10.1520/JFS13292J · DOI
  26. Page W, 1906, The Victoria history of the county of Lincoln
  27. 10.1016/j.quageo.2007.07.001 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1002/1096-8644(200009)113:1<135::AID-AJPA13>3.0.CO;2-A · DOI
  29. 10.1007/s004140050283 · DOI
  30. Robinson C, 1984, Is the rat incisor typical?, INSERM, 125, 377
  31. Saunders SR, 2000, Biological anthropology of the human skeleton, 135
  32. Smith BH, 1991, Advances in dental anthropology, 143
  33. Trimble D, 1991, Excavation of a medieval hospital cemetery in Grantham, Lincolnshire Past Present, 5, 10
  34. 10.1016/S0146-6380(98)00098-9 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Griffin, R. C., Chamberlain, A. T., Hotz, G., Penkman, K. E. H., & Collins, M. J.
Venue
American Journal of Physical Anthropology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-04-08
Volume
140
Issue
2
Pages
244-252
ISSN
  • 0002-9483
  • 1096-8644
Cited by
32
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review