The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A new method to estimate adult age‐at‐death using the acetabulum
Abstract
Rissech et al. (J Forensic Sci 51 ( 2006 ) 213–229) described a method to estimate age‐at‐death of adult males using seven traits of the fused acetabulum. This study simplifies Rissech et al.'s technique and extends its application to adult females. Rissech et al.'s original scoring method was applied to a sample of 100 known‐aged adults, three variables were selected based on stepwise multiple regression, and ages were collapsed into three broad ranges: young adult (17–39 years), middle adult (40–64 years), and old adult (65+ years). The revised method was applied to 249 new known‐aged individuals from two other samples. To minimize observer bias, highlight the most critical traits, and encompass more age‐related variation, unique digital renderings accompany morphological descriptions of age categories instead of photos. Three statistically significant characteristics highly correlated with age ( P < 0.05) are capable of estimating age‐at‐death with 81% accuracy, both sexes combined. For misidentified individuals the tendency was to underestimate age. Results of both intraobserver error testing and inter‐rater reliability demonstrated a moderate to substantial agreement in scoring between observers. When estimating the degree of development of features osteophyte development of the acetabular rim was the most inconsistent between observers. The revised acetabular method shows promise in estimating age for adults, particularly for those over the age of 65 years. Am J Phys Anthropol 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“To streamline the acetabulum approach, they first reduced the number of variables from seven to three, along with the descriptions for both males and females' os coxae. Young adults, middle adults, and old adults were the three age stages that were distinguished by the three observable features (apical growth, osteophyte development of the acetabular rim, and acetabular groove) [22].”
From Three methods of estimating age‐at‐death using three different regions on the os coxa (2026) · cites this paper as [22]
Citations
Cites
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 · Cited by 24,532
Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice,
(2002) · Survey of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0039-6257(02)00362-4 · Cited by 9,489
A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility.
Lin, L. I.-K. (1989) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2532051 · Cited by 8,785
Fleiss, J. L., & Cohen, J. (1973) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316447303300309 · Cited by 3,354
Brooks, S., & Suchey, J. M. (1990) · Human Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf02437238 · Cited by 2,213
Lovejoy, C. O., Meindl, R. S., Pryzbeck, T. R., & Mensforth, R. P. (1985) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330680103 · Cited by 2,062
Multivariate Statistical Methods: A Primer
Nemeth, M. A. (1997) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1997.10485166 · Cited by 1,294
Forensic Taphonomy: The Postmortem Fate of Human Remains
İşcan, M. Y., & McCabe, B. Q. (2001) · Forensic Science International · doi:10.1016/s0379-0738(00)00376-5 · Cited by 1,266
Forensic Osteology: Advances in the Identification of Human Remains
Reichs, K., & Bass, W. M. (1998) · Cited by 923
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- 10.1037/0033-2909.83.5.762 · DOI · Paper page
- Hintze J, 2006, NCSS, PASS and GESS
- Ross AH, 2009, Handbook of forensic anthropology and archaeology, 479
- 2010, SPSS for Windows, Rel. 19.0.0
- Stull KA, 2010, Age estimation of the human skeleton, 134
Cited by
A Comparison of Different Age Estimation Methods of the Adult Pelvis
Miranker, M. (2016) · Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1111/1556-4029.13130 · Cited by 58
Inter‐population differences in acetabular senescence: relevance in age‐at‐death estimation
San-Millán, M., & Rissech, C. (2023) · International Journal of Legal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00414-023-02954-x · Cited by 8
Three methods of estimating age‐at‐death using three different regions on the os coxa
Mkhonza, S. S., Ngubane, N. P., Aladeyelu, O. S., & Rennie, C. O. (2026) · Journal of Forensic Sciences · doi:10.1111/1556-4029.70219
Metadata
- Authors
- Calce, S. E.
- Venue
- American Journal of Physical Anthropology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-02-13
- Volume
- 148
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 11-23
- ISSN
- 0002-9483
- 1096-8644
- Cited by
- 90
- References
- 33
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A new method to estimate adult age‐at‐death using the acetabulum. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ajpa.22026
- The paper
- Calce, S. E. (2012). A new method to estimate adult age‐at‐death using the acetabulum. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.22026
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.