The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The diet‐body offset in human nitrogen isotopic values: A controlled dietary study
Open accessAbstract
The “trophic level enrichment” between diet and body results in an overall increase in nitrogen isotopic values as the food chain is ascended. Quantifying the diet–body Δ 15 N spacing has proved difficult, particularly for humans. The value is usually assumed to be +3–5‰ in the archaeological literature. We report here the first (to our knowledge) data from humans on isotopically known diets, comparing dietary intake and a body tissue sample, that of red blood cells. Samples were taken from 11 subjects on controlled diets for a 30‐day period, where the controlled diets were designed to match each individual's habitual diet, thus reducing problems with short‐term changes in diet causing isotopic changes in the body pool. The Δ 15 N diet‐RBC was measured as +3.5‰. Using measured offsets from other studies, we estimate the human Δ 15 N diet‐keratin as +5.0–5.3‰, which is in good agreement with values derived from the two other studies using individual diet records. We also estimate a value for Δ 15 N diet‐collagen of ≈6‰, again in combination with measured offsets from other studies. This value is larger than usually assumed in palaeodietary studies, which suggests that the proportion of animal protein in prehistoric human diet may have often been overestimated in isotopic studies of palaeodiet. Am J Phys Anthropol, 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical power analyses using G∗Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/brm.41.4.1149 · Cited by 37,615
The Bagplot: A Bivariate Boxplot
Rousseeuw, P. J., Ruts, I., & Tukey, J. W. (1999) · The American Statistician · doi:10.2307/2686061 · Cited by 568
Sluijs, I., Beulens, J. W. J., van der A, D. L., Spijkerman, A. M. W., Grobbee, D. E., & van der Schouw, Y. T. (2010) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc09-1321 · Cited by 335
Cited by
Bastos, M. Q. R., Santos, R. V., M. de Souza, S. M. F., Rodrigues-Carvalho, C., Tykot, R. H., Cook, D. C., & Santos, R. V. (2016) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2016.04.020 · Cited by 58
Fenner, J. N., Tumen, D., & Khatanbaatar, D. (2014) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2014.03.017 · Cited by 24
Stantis, C., Buckley, H. R., Kinaston, R. L., Nunn, P. D., Jaouen, K., & Richards, M. P. (2016) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.22884 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- O'Connell, T. C., Kneale, C. J., Tasevska, N., & Kuhnle, G. G. C.
- Venue
- American Journal of Physical Anthropology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-10-05
- Volume
- 149
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 426-434
- ISSN
- 0002-9483 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-8644
- OpenAlex
- W2126847427
- Cited by
- 461
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 16.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The diet‐body offset in human nitrogen isotopic values: A controlled dietary study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ajpa.22140
- The paper
- O'Connell, T. C., Kneale, C. J., Tasevska, N., & Kuhnle, G. G. C. (2012). The diet‐body offset in human nitrogen isotopic values: A controlled dietary study. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.22140
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.