Cited by 196Pleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyEvolution and Paleontology StudiesPrimate Behavior and Ecology

Hominin taxic diversity: Fact or fantasy?

Wood, Bernard, K. Boyle, Eve·2016·American Journal of Physical Anthropology

Abstract

In this review of the evidence for and against taxic diversity within the hominin clade, we begin by looking at the logic and the history of simple “ladder‐like” interpretations of the hominin fossil record. We then look at the hominin fossil record in a series of time intervals and use current published evidence about the first and last appearance dates of each taxon to decide whether a species or specimens should be included in one, or more, of the intervals. Within each time interval, we consider the strength of the evidence that more than one hominin species is sampled. Decisions about whether taxonomic diversity exists depend on what alpha taxonomic hypotheses are used and although we use a relatively speciose interpretation of the hominin fossil record, we also explore what impact more inclusive interpretations of alpha taxonomy would have on assessments of hominin taxic diversity. With the exception of the oldest (7–5 Ma) all of the other time intervals have in our judgment at least one well‐supported example of taxic diversity and several have multiple examples. In summary, not all new hominin taxa are created equally, but while taxic diversity may not be as prevalent as some have claimed, it is a feature of the hominin clade from 4 Ma until c .40 ka years ago. Am J Phys Anthropol 159:S37–S78, 2016. © 2016 American Association of Physical Anthropologists

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajpa.22902

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The mammalian skull is developmentally complex and a highly integrated structure.

    “The mammalian skull is developmentally complex and a highly integrated structure 91 .”

    From The evolutionary history of the human face (2019) · cites this paper as [91]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 350 · Cited by 196

Authors
Wood, B., & K. Boyle, E.
Affiliations
  • George Washington University (US)
  • Center for the Advanced Study of Human Paleobiology, George Washington University Washington DC 20052
Corresponding author
Wood, Bernard
Venue
American Journal of Physical Anthropology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-01
Volume
159
Issue
S61
Pages
37-78
ISSN
  • 0002-9483 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-8644
OpenAlex
W2265993969
Cited by
196
References
350
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 1
FWCI
92.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Physical Anthropology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
George Washington University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
hominin fossil record, alpha taxonomy, species diversity, hominin evolution, taxonomic interpretation
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Evolution, Female, Fossils, Male, Genetic Variation, Hominidae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review