Analyses of Neanderthal introgression suggest that Levantine and southern Arabian populations have a shared population history
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Objectives: Modern humans are thought to have interbred with Neanderthals in the Near East soon after modern humans dispersed out of Africa. This introgression event likely took place in either the Levant or southern Arabia depending on the dispersal route out of Africa that was followed. In this study, we compare Neanderthal introgression in contemporary Levantine and southern Arabian populations to investigate Neanderthal introgression and to study Near Eastern population history. Materials and Methods: We analyzed genotyping data on >400,000 autosomal SNPs from seven Levantine and five southern Arabian populations and compared these data to those from populations from around the world including Neanderthal and Denisovan genomes. We used f 4 and D statistics to estimate and compare levels of Neanderthal introgression between Levantine, southern Arabian, and comparative global populations. We also identified 1,581 putative Neanderthal‐introgressed SNPs within our dataset and analyzed their allele frequencies as a means to compare introgression patterns in Levantine and southern Arabian genomes. Results: We find that Levantine and southern Arabian populations have similar levels of Neanderthal introgression to each other but lower levels than other non‐Africans. Furthermore, we find that introgressed SNPs have very similar allele frequencies in the Levant and southern Arabia, which indicates that Neanderthal introgression is similarly distributed in Levantine and southern Arabian genomes. Discussion: We infer that the ancestors of contemporary Levantine and southern Arabian populations received Neanderthal introgression prior to separating from each other and that there has been extensive gene flow between these populations.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Early farmers are partly genetically derived from the previously identified basal Eurasian lineage.
“It has been proposed that the early FAs are partly genetically derived from the previously identified “basal Eurasian” lineage (16, 17, 51).”
From Past human expansions shaped the spatial pattern of Neanderthal ancestry (2023) · cites this paper as [51]
The Discussion (page unavailable) reports Basal Eurasian ancestry in ancient western Eurasians and high levels of that ancestry in Near Eastern populations. It does not identify those populations as early farmers, so it supports the ancestry component but not the claim about early farmers specifically. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredModern Levantine and southern Arabian populations still have lower Neanderthal ancestry than northern Eurasian populations.
“Note that it was recently found that modern Levantine and southern Arabian populations still have lower NE ancestry than northern Eurasian populations (51).”
From Past human expansions shaped the spatial pattern of Neanderthal ancestry (2023) · cites this paper as [51]
The basal Eurasian lineage diverged from other Eurasian hunter-gatherer populations before the latter mixed with Neanderthals, and therefore had a lower Neanderthal ancestry.
“This lineage is thought to have diverged from other Eurasian HG populations before the latter mixed with the NE, and therefore had a lower NE ancestry (16, 17, 51).”
From Past human expansions shaped the spatial pattern of Neanderthal ancestry (2023) · cites this paper as [51]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 75 · Cited by 11
- Authors
- Vyas, D. N., & Mulligan, C. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- Vyas, Deven N.
- Venue
- American Journal of Physical Anthropology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-03-19
- Volume
- 169
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 227-239
- ISSN
- 0002-9483 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-8644
- OpenAlex
- W2950292414
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 75
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 8.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- American Journal of Physical Anthropology (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (BCS‐1258965)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
- Keywords
- Neanderthal introgression, human dispersal out of Africa, gene flow, allele frequency, D-statistic, shared ancestry
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Arabia, Gene Frequency, Genetics, Population, Humans, Middle East, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, History, Ancient, Gene Flow, Neanderthals, Human Migration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review