Cited by 27Sinusitis and nasal conditionsCystic Fibrosis Research AdvancesNasal Surgery and Airway Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Determinants and outcomes of upfront surgery versus medical therapy for chronic rhinosinusitis in cystic fibrosis

Ayoub, Noel, Thamboo, Andrew, Habib, Al‐Rahim, Nayak, Jayakar V., Hwang, Peter H.·2017·International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology

Abstract

Background The indications for surgical management of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) are poorly defined. In this study we compare outcomes of medical versus surgical treatment and examine trends associated with the transition from medical to surgical therapy in CF patients. Methods One hundred thirty-six patients with CF referred to a tertiary rhinology practice were retrospectively divided into 3 cohorts: Medical, Upfront Surgery, or Crossover, if they converted from medical to surgical management. The 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) and pulmonary function test (PFT) data were assessed up to 48 months. Results Compared to patients initially managed medically (n = 90), those who pursued upfront surgery (n = 46) had a greater incidence of nasal polyposis (p = 0.0011), prior sinus surgery (p = 0.0025), lower percent-predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (%FEV 1 ) (p = 0.0063), and higher Lund-Mackay (p = 0.0025) and SNOT-22 (p = 0.0229) scores. Within the medical group, 35.5% converted to surgery after a mean of 14.3 months. Crossover (n = 32) was associated with a 6.1-point increase in SNOT-22 and a 4.5% deterioration in %FEV 1 . Despite worsened symptom severity, the Crossover cohort ultimately achieved similar postoperative SNOT-22 scores (p = 0.831) and %FEV 1 (p = 0.114) as those who underwent upfront surgery. Although the Medical cohort had the lowest baseline SNOT-22 scores (p Conclusions Surgery effectively reduces…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/alr.21912

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Surgery may be beneficial in patients with nasal polyps with associated asthma, aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease, or cystic fibrosis.

    “Surgery may be beneficial in patients with NP with associated asthma [228,229], AERD [230], or cystic fibrosis [231-233].”

    From Position Paper on Nasal Obstruction: Evaluation and Treatment (2018) · cites this paper as [233]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry, 2014, Annual Data Report to the Center Directors
  2. 10.1177/000348941112000701 · DOI
  3. 10.1097/00005537-199608000-00018 · DOI
  4. 10.1002/alr.21695_c · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.ijporl.2006.08.015 · DOI
  6. 10.1177/000348940211101204 · DOI
  7. 10.1001/archoto.2010.162 · DOI
  8. 10.1002/alr.21252 · DOI
  9. 10.1002/alr.21190 · DOI
  10. 10.1002/lary.24503 · DOI
  11. 10.1002/lary.24027 · DOI
  12. 10.1002/lary.25108 · DOI
  13. Lowe HJ, 2009, STRIDE—an integrated standards‐based translational research informatics platform, AMIA Ann Symp Proc, 391
  14. 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1016/j.otohns.2007.07.021 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/S0194-59989770005-6 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/S0194-5998(97)70129-3 · DOI
  18. 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2009.01995.x · DOI
  19. 10.1002/alr.21607 · DOI
  20. 10.4193/Rhin11.271 · DOI
  21. 10.1164/ajrccm.159.5.9712056 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.jcf.2013.10.011 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.04.030 · DOI
  24. 10.1097/MCP.0000000000000107 · DOI
  25. 10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3146 · DOI
  26. 10.1001/archotol.1995.01890050058011 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ayoub, N., Thamboo, A., Habib, A., Nayak, J. V., & Hwang, P. H.
Affiliations
Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Hwang, Peter H.
Venue
International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-02-20
Volume
7
Issue
5
Pages
450-458
ISSN
  • 2042-6976 (ISSN-L)
  • 2042-6984
OpenAlex
W2590307692
Cited by
27
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
3.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Sinusitis and nasal conditions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
Keywords
chronic rhinosinusitis, cystic fibrosis, medical therapy, conversion to surgery, nasal polyps, SNOT-22, lung function, Lund-Mackay score, symptom outcomes
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Chronic Disease, Cystic Fibrosis, Female, Forced Expiratory Volume, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nasal Polyps, Rhinitis, Severity of Illness Index, Sinusitis, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult, Nasal Surgical Procedures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review