The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Determinants and outcomes of upfront surgery versus medical therapy for chronic rhinosinusitis in cystic fibrosis
Abstract
Background The indications for surgical management of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) are poorly defined. In this study we compare outcomes of medical versus surgical treatment and examine trends associated with the transition from medical to surgical therapy in CF patients. Methods One hundred thirty-six patients with CF referred to a tertiary rhinology practice were retrospectively divided into 3 cohorts: Medical, Upfront Surgery, or Crossover, if they converted from medical to surgical management. The 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) and pulmonary function test (PFT) data were assessed up to 48 months. Results Compared to patients initially managed medically (n = 90), those who pursued upfront surgery (n = 46) had a greater incidence of nasal polyposis (p = 0.0011), prior sinus surgery (p = 0.0025), lower percent-predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (%FEV 1 ) (p = 0.0063), and higher Lund-Mackay (p = 0.0025) and SNOT-22 (p = 0.0229) scores. Within the medical group, 35.5% converted to surgery after a mean of 14.3 months. Crossover (n = 32) was associated with a 6.1-point increase in SNOT-22 and a 4.5% deterioration in %FEV 1 . Despite worsened symptom severity, the Crossover cohort ultimately achieved similar postoperative SNOT-22 scores (p = 0.831) and %FEV 1 (p = 0.114) as those who underwent upfront surgery. Although the Medical cohort had the lowest baseline SNOT-22 scores (p Conclusions Surgery effectively reduces…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Surgery may be beneficial in patients with nasal polyps with associated asthma, aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease, or cystic fibrosis.
“Surgery may be beneficial in patients with NP with associated asthma [228,229], AERD [230], or cystic fibrosis [231-233].”
From Position Paper on Nasal Obstruction: Evaluation and Treatment (2018) · cites this paper as [233]
Citations
Cites
International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Rhinosinusitis
Orlandi, R. R., Kingdom, T. T., Hwang, P. H., Smith, T. L., Alt, J. A., Baroody, F. M., Batra, P. S., Bernal‐Sprekelsen, M., Bhattacharyya, N., Chandra, R. K., et al. (2016) · International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology · doi:10.1002/alr.21695 · Cited by 892
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry, 2014, Annual Data Report to the Center Directors
- 10.1177/000348941112000701 · DOI
- 10.1097/00005537-199608000-00018 · DOI
- 10.1002/alr.21695_c · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijporl.2006.08.015 · DOI
- 10.1177/000348940211101204 · DOI
- 10.1001/archoto.2010.162 · DOI
- 10.1002/alr.21252 · DOI
- 10.1002/alr.21190 · DOI
- 10.1002/lary.24503 · DOI
- 10.1002/lary.24027 · DOI
- 10.1002/lary.25108 · DOI
- Lowe HJ, 2009, STRIDE—an integrated standards‐based translational research informatics platform, AMIA Ann Symp Proc, 391
- 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.otohns.2007.07.021 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0194-59989770005-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0194-5998(97)70129-3 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2009.01995.x · DOI
- 10.1002/alr.21607 · DOI
- 10.4193/Rhin11.271 · DOI
- 10.1164/ajrccm.159.5.9712056 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jcf.2013.10.011 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.04.030 · DOI
- 10.1097/MCP.0000000000000107 · DOI
- 10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3146 · DOI
- 10.1001/archotol.1995.01890050058011 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Position Paper on Nasal Obstruction: Evaluation and Treatment
SEAIC Rhinoconjunctivitis Committee & SEORL Rhinology, A., Valero, A., Navarro, A., del Cuvillo, A., Alobid, I., Benito, Jr., Colás, C., de los Santos, G., Fernández Liesa, R., García-Lliberós, A., et al. (2018) · Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.18176/jiaci.0232 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Ayoub, N., Thamboo, A., Habib, A., Nayak, J. V., & Hwang, P. H.
- Affiliations
- Stanford Medicine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hwang, Peter H.
- Venue
- International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-02-20
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 450-458
- ISSN
- 2042-6976 (ISSN-L)
- 2042-6984
- OpenAlex
- W2590307692
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 3.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Sinusitis and nasal conditions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
- Keywords
- chronic rhinosinusitis, cystic fibrosis, medical therapy, conversion to surgery, nasal polyps, SNOT-22, lung function, Lund-Mackay score, symptom outcomes
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Chronic Disease, Cystic Fibrosis, Female, Forced Expiratory Volume, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nasal Polyps, Rhinitis, Severity of Illness Index, Sinusitis, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult, Nasal Surgical Procedures
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review