Cited by 73Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Evaluation of liraglutide in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease

Abstract

Background: Liraglutide is a glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) analogue licensed for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Preclinical evidence in transgenic models of Alzheimer’s disease suggests that liraglutide exerts neuroprotective effects by reducing amyloid oligomers, normalising synaptic plasticity and cerebral glucose uptake, and increasing the proliferation of neuronal progenitor cells. Methods: ELAD is a 12‐month, multi‐centre, randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, phase IIb trial of liraglutide in participants with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s dementia, conducted at several centres in the UK – (NCT01843075). [18F]FDG‐PET and MRI brain scans of all patients will be performed at baseline and after 12 months treatment with liraglutide or matching placebo. Once enrolled, all subjects had a neuropsychological battery of tests All scans and tests will be repeated after 12 months. A total of 204 participants were randomised to receive either liraglutide or placebo as a daily subcutaneous injection for 12 months. The primary objective was to evaluate the change in cerebral glucose metabolic rate in the cortical regions (hippocampus, medial temporal lobe, and posterior cingulate) from baseline to 12‐month follow‐up in participants with Alzheimer’s disease receiving treatment with liraglutide compared to those receiving placebo. The key secondary outcomes were the change from baseline to 12 months in z scores for clinical and cognitive measures (Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale – Cognitive Subscale and Executive domain scores of the Neuropsychological Test Battery, Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes, and Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study – Activities of Daily Living) and the incidence and severity of treatment‐emergent adverse events or clinically important changes in safety assessments. Other secondary outcomes were 12‐month change in magnetic resonance imaging volume, diffusion tensor imaging parameters, and changes in composite scores using support machine vector analysis in the treatment group compared with the placebo group. Results: The study demonstrated that liraglutide treated patients performed significantly better than placebo arm in temporal lobe and whole cortical MRI volume and cognitive function measured by ADAS‐EXEC (ADAS‐Cog with Executive domains of the Neuropsychological Test Battery). Conclusion: This demonstrates that GLP1 analogues can improve cognitive function and MRI volume in AD subjects and could be a potential treatment for treatment for Alzheimer's

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/alz.057848

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Edison, P., Femminella, G. D., Ritchie, C. W., Holmes, C., Walker, Z., Ridha, B. H., Raza, S., Livingston, N. R., Nowell, J., Busza, G., Frangou, E., Love, S., Williams, G., Lawrence, R. M., McFarlane, B., Archer, H., Coulthard, E., Underwood, B., Koranteng, P., Karim, S., Bannister, C., Perneczky, R., Prasanna, A., Junaid, K., McGuinness, B., Nilforooshan, R., Macharouthu, A., Donaldson, A., Thacker, S., Russell, G., Malik, N., Mate, V., Knight, L., Kshemendran, S., Holscher, C., Mansouri, A., Chester‐Jones, M., Holmes, J., Williams, S. C., Brooks, D. J., Harrison, J. E., Tadros, G., Passmore, A. P., & Ballard, C.
Affiliations
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • University of Southampton (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
  • UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • National Health Service (GB)
  • Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • North Bristol NHS Trust (GB)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust Cambridge United Kingdom
  • Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Lancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • LMU Klinikum (DE)
  • Black Country Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Queen's University Belfast (GB)
  • Surrey and Borders NHS Foundation Trust Chertsey United Kingdom
  • NHS Ayrshire and Arran Kilmarnock United Kingdom
  • NHS Lanarkshire (GB)
  • Derbyshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust Derby United Kingdom
  • Bradford District Care NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • North West Boroughs Partnership NHS Foundation Trust Warrington United Kingdom
  • Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Somerset Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • South Staffordshire and Shropshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust Shrewsbury United Kingdom
  • Henan University of Chinese Medicine Zhengzhou China
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • University of Exeter (GB)
Corresponding author
Edison, Paul
Venue
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-12
Volume
17
Issue
S9
ISSN
  • 1552-5260 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5279
OpenAlex
W3213733158
Cited by
73
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6
FWCI
2.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Alzheimer s & Dementia (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
Keywords
liraglutide, Alzheimer's disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review