Unobtrusive In‐Home Digital Monitoring of Frontotemporal Dementia: Feasibility and Adherence
Open accessAbstract
Background: Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD) patients are geographically dispersed and often have behavioral and/or motor deficits that limit access to in‐person clinical trials and research. To address these participation barriers, we investigated the feasibility of installing in‐home sensor technologies to remotely assess everyday functioning in FTD. Method: We aimed to recruit 20 FTD participants with a variety of clinical syndromes, including behavioral variant FTD (bvFTD), primary progressive aphasia (PPA), corticobasal syndrome (CBS), and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). We also aimed to enroll a study partner for each participant that lived in the same home to serve as a control. The Collaborative Aging Research Using Technology (CART) platform was installed in participants’ homes to collect continuous data for up to two years, using motion sensors, physiological monitoring devices (e.g., scales, sleep sensors), electronic pillboxes, and wearable actigraphs. Computer use and driving patterns were also tracked. Technology was installed either via a study coordinator visit or remotely through video and written instructions, based on schedule and logistics. Participants were asked to complete a weekly Qualtrics survey about time away from home, visitors, and health changes. Result: Of the 159 UCSF participants available for recruitment through ALLFTD and other FTD projects, 28% (N = 45) met inclusion criteria. Of those 45, ten were ineligible due to advanced disease severity or relocation to an assisted living facility. A third (36%, N = 17) declined due to overwhelmed study partners (N = 3), declined any subproject participation (N = 7), sensitivity to participant’s diagnosis (N = 2), or lack of response (N = 5). Two additional participants were recruited through UCLA’s ALLFTD cohort. The platform has been installed in 19 homes (bvFTD: n = 10; PPA: n = 5; CBS/PSP: n = 4). Two homes discontinued due to death or relocation to assisted living facility. Mean data collection is 360 days (max = 527). Of 103 reported technological issues, 92% were resolved without additional home visits, either by phone or email. Participants completed 65% of weekly health questionnaires. Conclusions: Although there were some recruitment and retention challenges, these findings generally provide preliminary support for the feasibility and sustainability of conducting comprehensive in‐home passive data research in FTD.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Preliminary findings in FTD provide support for the feasibility and sustainability of conducting comprehensive in-home passive data research in FTD.
“Preliminary findings in FTD provide support for the feasibility and sustainability of conducting comprehensive in‐home passive data research in FTD. 59 , 60”
From Developing digital health technologies for frontotemporal degeneration (2025) · cites this paper as [60]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Developing digital health technologies for frontotemporal degeneration
Nevler, N., Niehoff, D., Gleixner, A. M., Dodge, S., Vogel, A. P., Hill, D. L., Ducharme, S., Staffaroni, A. M., Yunusova, Y., Au, R., et al. (2025) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.70082 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Wise, A. B., Paolillo, E. W., Beattie, Z. T., Wu, C., Rodrigues, N., Gothard, S., Heuer, H. W., Forsberg, L. K., Chavez, D., Holiday, K., Mendez, M. F., Boeve, B. F., Boxer, A. L., Kaye, J. A., Rosen, H. J., & Staffaroni, A. M.
- Affiliations
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Oregon Center for Aging & Technology (ORCATECH), Portland, OR USA
- Harvard University (US)
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN USA
- Oregon Health & Science University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wise, Amy B.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Alzheimer's & Dementia
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-12
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- S18
- Pages
- e071655-e071655
- ISSN
- 1552-5260 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5279
- OpenAlex
- W4390193520
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 0.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Alzheimer s & Dementia (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
- Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
- Keywords
- frontotemporal dementia
- MeSH terms
- Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Supranuclear Palsy, Progressive, Aphasia, Primary Progressive, Frontotemporal Dementia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review