Cited by 2Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFamily Caregiving in Mental Illness

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effects of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) group intervention for the treatment of anxiety in family carers of people with dementia: an exploratory randomised controlled trial

Open access

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of anxiety symptoms is estimated to be equal to or higher than the prevalence of depressive symptoms in family carers of people with dementia. However, anxiety is currently somehow neglected in the carer literature. Previous studies demonstrated that Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is effective for treating anxiety symptoms in family carers of people with dementia, but these studies were mainly conducted in developed countries. The current study explored the effectiveness of an ACT group intervention on the anxiety symptoms in Brazilian family carers of people with dementia. Method: A single‐centre, unblinded, double‐arm exploratory randomised trial was conducted. Fifty‐seven family carers of people with dementia presenting with mild to severe anxiety symptoms were randomised to the intervention group (n = 29) or waiting list group (n = 28). The intervention group received eight weekly sessions of Group ACT, delivered through videoconference. Participants completed the measure of anxiety and depressive symptoms, caregiver burden, psychological flexibility and quality of life at Week 0, Week 9 and Week 20. Multiple linear regression analyses were performed to evaluate whether there was a significant difference in scores between the intervention and control groups, at week 9 and week 20, while controlling for the baseline scores using both intention‐to‐treat and completers data analyses. Result: Participants were mostly women, from low‐ to middle‐income socioeconomic levels, with a mean age of 52 years and median education of 15 years. Participants in the intervention group had lower scores of anxiety and depression symptoms compared to participants in the control condition at weeks 9 and 20 in both the intention‐to‐treat and completer analyses. Only participants who attended six or more sessions (i.e. completer sample) demonstrated reduced caregiver burden at both follow‐up points. The completer sample also showed improvement in quality of life at week 9. The results did not show any effect of the intervention on psychological flexibility. Conclusion: This study provides evidence supporting the use of group ACT, delivered through videoconference, with family carers of people with dementia to help them cope better with anxiety and depressive symptoms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/alz.073140

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evidence for feasibility and acceptability of remote and in-person ACT interventions has been generated in the USA and Europe.

    “Evidence for feasibility and acceptability of remote and in-person ACT interventions has been generated in the USA and Europe (Atefi et al., 2024; Ferreira et al., 2023; Scott et al., 2023).”

    From Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Tele-Counselling Program With Care Partners of Persons Living With Dementia: A Pilot Feasibility RCT. (2026) · cites this paper as Ferreira et al., 2023

    The Abstract (page unavailable) describes a remotely delivered ACT intervention, which supports the remote-intervention part of the claim. But this trial involved Brazilian family carers, not participants in the USA or Europe, and the reported outcomes concern effectiveness rather than feasibility or acceptability. It provides no evidence for an in-person intervention. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ferreira, M. G., Kishita, N., de Faria, R. C. V., Plautino, M. E. A., Yonamine, G. C., Torres, S. C. R., & Caramelli, P.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR)
  • University of East Anglia (GB)
Corresponding author
Ferreira, Michele Gomes
Venue
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-12
Volume
19
Issue
S19
ISSN
  • 1552-5260 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5279
OpenAlex
W4390200742
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Alzheimer s & Dementia (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
Keywords
acceptance and commitment therapy, group intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review