Omics analysis of Alzheimer’s disease stratified by the microglial polygenic effect
Open accessAbstract
Background: Recent single‐cell omics analyses have revealed that microglia change into reactive microglia when Aβ accumulates in the brain and exhibit Aβ phagocytosis. However, reactive microglia are less likely to be induced in TREM2 mutation carriers. This microglia‐centred pathological mechanism may be considered one of the pathologies of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, a single gene mutation, such as a TREM2 mutation, can rarely explain the pathology of AD. Therefore, polygenic effects involving multiple gene mutations have been proposed. In this study, we propose a polygenic risk score (PRS) to quantify the microglial polygenic effect. We stratified patient groups by this PRS and examined differences in pathogenesis based on omics analysis using postmortem brains. Method: Whole‐genome sequencing and bulk brain tissue RNA‐seq of the frontal cortex were performed using postmortem brain samples from 100 subjects with Braak senile plaque (SP) and neurofibrillary tangle (NFT) staging information. In addition, single‐nuclei RNA‐seq (snRNA‐seq) was performed on 15 of these subjects (healthy subjects: 8 subjects, AD patients: 7 subjects). Result: We divided AD patients into low and high groups by microglial PRS and performed bulk brain tissue RNA‐seq analysis. We identified 112 differentially expressed genes and found that those genes were related to autophagy and inflammation. To further validate these findings at the single‐cell level, we identified cell clusters containing microglia based on snRNA‐seq. Gene expression analysis of microglia in 3 AD patients with low PRS and 4 AD patients with high PRS suggested altered transcriptional profiles of immune cells and phagocytosis. The expression of APOE and TYROBP, signature genes of reactive microglia, was significantly upregulated in the AD patients with low PRS compared to the AD patients with high PRS and healthy subjects. In contrast, CX3CR1 and P2RY12, signature genes of homeostatic microglia, were downregulated. Conclusion: The stratification analysis of AD by PRS suggests that microglial reactivity differs among AD patient groups. Future detailed microglial observations in postmortem brains from AD patients with low PRS and those with high PRS will further elaborate our results.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Peripheral blood transcriptome analyses can classify patients into immune and metabolic subgroups with diagnostic performance comparable to established biomarker frameworks like Amyloid, Tau, and Neurodegeneration (ATN).
“Complementary analyses of peripheral blood transcriptomes have enabled patient classification into immune and metabolic subgroups, achieving diagnostic performance comparable to established biomarker frameworks like Amyloid, Tau, and Neurodegeneration (ATN)71,349,351,398.”
From Artificial intelligence-driven multi-omics approaches in Alzheimer's disease: Progress, challenges, and future directions (2025) · cites this paper as [398]
Deep learning frameworks have uncovered novel biological pathways, including those related to neuroinflammation and metabolic regulation, which account for diverse disease trajectories.
“Deep learning frameworks continue to uncover novel biological pathways, including those related to neuroinflammation and metabolic regulation, which account for diverse disease trajectories397,398.”
From Artificial intelligence-driven multi-omics approaches in Alzheimer's disease: Progress, challenges, and future directions (2025) · cites this paper as [398]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ren, F., Wei, J., Chen, Q., Hu, M., Yu, L., Mi, J., Zhou, X., Qin, D., Wu, J., & Wu, A. (2025) · Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B · doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2025.07.030 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kikuchi, M., Miyashita, A., Hirota, Y., Hara, N., Hasegawa, M., Sakakibara, Y., Sekiya, M., Saito, Y., Murayama, S., Iijima, K. M., & Ikeuchi, T.
- Affiliations
- The University of Tokyo (JP)
- Brain Research Institute, Niigata University (JP)
- National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology (JP)
- Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Kikuchi, Masataka
- ORCID
- Venue
- Alzheimer's & Dementia
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2023-12
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- S12
- ISSN
- 1552-5260 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5279
- OpenAlex
- W4390199598
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 0.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Alzheimer s & Dementia (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Keywords
- Alzheimer's disease, microglia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review