Cited by 3Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A preliminary feasibility study on screening cognitive impairment based on multi-modal biomarkers and stacking ensemble AI approach

Open access

Abstract

Background: Early screening of cognitive impairment is crucial for patients demanding timely treatment. The need for cost‐effective, easily accessible, and accurate tools to detect cognitive decline rapidly progressed with the breakout of the COVID‐19 pandemic. In this work, we proposed a mobile‐app based cognitive assessment tool, “Alzguard‐D”, equipped with two digital biomarkers along with a cognitive task. Next, we investigated the efficacy of “Alzguard‐D” in early screening of cognitive impairment using a machine learning approach. Method: Nine “Alzguard‐D” tasks were designed based on three biomarkers: Keystroke, speech and eye movement (Table 1; Figure 1). Total of 289 participants were recruited from the national institute of dementia, welfare center, and nursing homes. The participants first completed the Korean Mini‐Mental State Examination (K‐MMSE; 2nd Edition), then performed all tasks in “Alzguard‐D”. “Alzguard‐D” took approximately 20 to 30 minutes. The participants were then categorized to healthy control (HC; n = 241) and cognitively impaired (CI; n = 48), defined as when the scores of K‐MMSE were one standard deviation below the age, education and gender‐matched norm. Given the data, we investigated the extent in which the combination of digital biomarkers and cognitive tasks improves the screening accuracy. We used a stacking ensemble model where the first stack analyzed speech and eye movement, and the second performed the classification. Result: The screening result confirmed that the addition of digital biomarkers collected by “Alzguard‐D” significantly improved the classification performance (p < 0.0001; sample paired t‐test). CatBoost algorithm statistically outperformed all other candidate algorithms (Bagging, Logistic Regression, LGBM, Naïve Bayes, XGBoost, Random Forest, SVM, Gradient Boosting). We then conducted an ablation study with three classifiers trained with (i) Cog+Bio, (ii) Bio and (iii) Cog. Cog+Bio achieved the highest AUC score, 0.876 (max: 0.942), followed by Bio with 0.783 (max: 0.845), then Cog with 0.677 (max: 0.726) (Figure 2). Conclusion: A combination of cognitive and digital biomarkers significantly increased the screening performance of cognitive impairment, and employing an intermediate feature‐level ensemble approach to effectively analyze the collected multi‐modal data increased the AUC levels.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/alz.082466

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kim, W., Kim, J. S., Ko, H. J., Yun, B. H., Kim, Y. Y., Kim, D. H., Kwon, U. J., Lim, S. K., Kim, B. R., Lee, J. H., Kim, G. H., & Kim, J. W.
Affiliations
  • HAII Inc., Seoul Korea Republic of (South)
  • Sangmyung University (KR)
  • Yonsei University (KR)
  • Ewha Womans University (KR)
Corresponding author
Lee, Jee Hang
Venue
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2023-12
Volume
19
Issue
S24
ISSN
  • 1552-5260 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5279
OpenAlex
W4390201885
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1
FWCI
0.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Alzheimer s & Dementia (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Keywords
cognitive screening, digital biomarkers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review