Theoretical impact of the AT(N) framework on dementia using a community autopsy sample
Open accessAbstract
The AT(N) research framework categorizes eight biomarker profiles using amyloid (A), tauopathy (T), and neurodegeneration (N), regardless of dementia status. We evaluated associations with dementia risk in a community‐based cohort by approximating AT(N) profiles using autopsy‐based neuropathology correlates, and considered cost implications for clinical trials for secondary prevention of dementia based on AT(N) profiles. We used Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (moderate/frequent) to approximate A+, Braak stage (IV‐VI) for T+, and temporal pole lateral ventricular dilation for (N)+. Outcomes included dementia prevalence at death and incidence in the last 5 years of life. A+T+(N)+ was the most common profile (31%). Dementia prevalence ranged from 14% (A–T–[N]–) to 79% (A+T+[N]+). Between 8% (A+T–[N]–) and 68% (A+T+[N]–) of decedents developed incident dementia in the last 5 years of life. Clinical trials would incur substantial expense to characterize AT(N). Many people with biomarker‐defined preclinical Alzheimer's disease will never develop clinical dementia during life, highlighting resilience to clinical expression of AD neuropathologic changes and the need for improved tools for prediction beyond current AT(N) biomarkers.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 47 · Cited by 13
- Authors
- Burke, B. T., Latimer, C., Keene, C. D., Sonnen, J. A., McCormick, W., Bowen, J. D., McCurry, S. M., Larson, E. B., & Crane, P. K.
- Affiliations
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- McGill University (CA)
- Swedish Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Crane, Paul K.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Alzheimer's & Dementia
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-04-26
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1879-1891
- ISSN
- 1552-5260 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5279
- PMC
- PMC8875276
- OpenAlex
- W3159614826
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 1.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Alzheimer s & Dementia (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute on Aging (U01AG006781, P50AG005136, 1K08AG065426)
- Nancy and Buster Alvord Endowment
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Keywords
- dementia risk
- MeSH terms
- Neuropathology, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Autopsy, Brain, Dementia, Female, Humans, Male, Cohort Studies, Biomarkers, Neurofibrillary Tangles, Positron-Emission Tomography, Secondary Prevention, Plaque, Amyloid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review