Cited by 13Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Theoretical impact of the AT(N) framework on dementia using a community autopsy sample

Open access
Burke, Bridget Teevan, Latimer, Caitlin, Keene, C. Dirk, Sonnen, Joshua A., McCormick, Wayne, Bowen, James D., McCurry, Susan M., Larson, Eric B. +1 more·2021·Alzheimer's & Dementia

Abstract

The AT(N) research framework categorizes eight biomarker profiles using amyloid (A), tauopathy (T), and neurodegeneration (N), regardless of dementia status. We evaluated associations with dementia risk in a community‐based cohort by approximating AT(N) profiles using autopsy‐based neuropathology correlates, and considered cost implications for clinical trials for secondary prevention of dementia based on AT(N) profiles. We used Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (moderate/frequent) to approximate A+, Braak stage (IV‐VI) for T+, and temporal pole lateral ventricular dilation for (N)+. Outcomes included dementia prevalence at death and incidence in the last 5 years of life. A+T+(N)+ was the most common profile (31%). Dementia prevalence ranged from 14% (A–T–[N]–) to 79% (A+T+[N]+). Between 8% (A+T–[N]–) and 68% (A+T+[N]–) of decedents developed incident dementia in the last 5 years of life. Clinical trials would incur substantial expense to characterize AT(N). Many people with biomarker‐defined preclinical Alzheimer's disease will never develop clinical dementia during life, highlighting resilience to clinical expression of AD neuropathologic changes and the need for improved tools for prediction beyond current AT(N) biomarkers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/alz.12348

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 47 · Cited by 13

Authors
Burke, B. T., Latimer, C., Keene, C. D., Sonnen, J. A., McCormick, W., Bowen, J. D., McCurry, S. M., Larson, E. B., & Crane, P. K.
Affiliations
  • Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • McGill University (CA)
  • Swedish Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Crane, Paul K.
Venue
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-04-26
Volume
17
Issue
12
Pages
1879-1891
ISSN
  • 1552-5260 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5279
OpenAlex
W3159614826
Cited by
13
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2022: 3
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alzheimer s & Dementia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (U01AG006781, P50AG005136, 1K08AG065426)
  • Nancy and Buster Alvord Endowment
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
dementia risk
MeSH terms
Neuropathology, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Autopsy, Brain, Dementia, Female, Humans, Male, Cohort Studies, Biomarkers, Neurofibrillary Tangles, Positron-Emission Tomography, Secondary Prevention, Plaque, Amyloid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review