Cited by 62Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications

Towards clinical application of tau PET tracers for diagnosing dementia due to Alzheimer's disease

Open access
Ossenkoppele, Rik, Hansson, Oskar·2021·Alzheimer's & Dementia

Abstract

The recent development of several tau positron emission tomography (PET) tracers represents a major milestone for the Alzheimer's disease (AD) field. These tau PET tracers bind tau neurofibrillary tangles, a key neuropathological characteristic of AD that is tightly linked to synaptic loss, brain atrophy, and cognitive decline. It is notable that these tau PET tracers show low uptake in most non‐AD tauopathies and other neurodegenerative disorders, resulting in a diagnostic specificity that is superior to that of amyloid beta (Aβ) PET and biofluid markers, especially at an older age when incidental Aβ pathology is common. Furthermore, tau PET tracers diagnostically outperform widely used MRI markers. Given its excellent diagnostic performance due to the combination of high sensitivity and specificity for detecting tau pathology in AD dementia, we hypothesize that tau PET can become an important diagnostic tool in specialized clinics for the differential diagnosis of dementia syndromes where AD is among the major possible underlying diseases.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/alz.12356

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Overall, tau PET deposition mirrors progression of AD pathology and correlates with disease severity.

    “Overall, tau PET deposition mirrors the progression of AD pathology, correlates with disease severity and in that respect it is hypothesised that will become one of the most important tools for the differential diagnosis between AD and non-AD dementias [191, 199, 200].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 118 · Cited by 62

Authors
Ossenkoppele, R., & Hansson, O.
Affiliations
Lund University (SE)
Corresponding author
Ossenkoppele, Rik
Venue
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-05-13
Volume
17
Issue
12
Pages
1998-2008
ISSN
  • 1552-5260 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5279
OpenAlex
W3160236175
Cited by
62
References
118
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 3
FWCI
5.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alzheimer s & Dementia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
tau PET tracers, Alzheimer's disease
MeSH terms
Aged, Atrophy, Dementia, Female, Humans, Male, Biomarkers, tau Proteins, Tauopathies, Positron-Emission Tomography, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review