Towards clinical application of tau PET tracers for diagnosing dementia due to Alzheimer's disease
Open accessAbstract
The recent development of several tau positron emission tomography (PET) tracers represents a major milestone for the Alzheimer's disease (AD) field. These tau PET tracers bind tau neurofibrillary tangles, a key neuropathological characteristic of AD that is tightly linked to synaptic loss, brain atrophy, and cognitive decline. It is notable that these tau PET tracers show low uptake in most non‐AD tauopathies and other neurodegenerative disorders, resulting in a diagnostic specificity that is superior to that of amyloid beta (Aβ) PET and biofluid markers, especially at an older age when incidental Aβ pathology is common. Furthermore, tau PET tracers diagnostically outperform widely used MRI markers. Given its excellent diagnostic performance due to the combination of high sensitivity and specificity for detecting tau pathology in AD dementia, we hypothesize that tau PET can become an important diagnostic tool in specialized clinics for the differential diagnosis of dementia syndromes where AD is among the major possible underlying diseases.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Overall, tau PET deposition mirrors progression of AD pathology and correlates with disease severity.
“Overall, tau PET deposition mirrors the progression of AD pathology, correlates with disease severity and in that respect it is hypothesised that will become one of the most important tools for the differential diagnosis between AD and non-AD dementias [191, 199, 200].”
From The use of neuroimaging techniques in the early and differential diagnosis of dementia (2023) · cites this paper as [199]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 118 · Cited by 62
- Authors
- Ossenkoppele, R., & Hansson, O.
- Affiliations
- Lund University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Ossenkoppele, Rik
- Venue
- Alzheimer's & Dementia
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-05-13
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1998-2008
- ISSN
- 1552-5260 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5279
- OpenAlex
- W3160236175
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 118
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 5.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- pure.amsterdamumc.nl
- Licence
- Locations
- Alzheimer s & Dementia (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- tau PET tracers, Alzheimer's disease
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Atrophy, Dementia, Female, Humans, Male, Biomarkers, tau Proteins, Tauopathies, Positron-Emission Tomography, Cognitive Dysfunction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review