Using high‐resolution array tomography to validate the use of synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A as a biomarker for synaptic loss in Alzheimer's disease
Open accessAbstract
Background: Numerous studies have used Synaptic Vesicle Glycoprotein 2A (SV2A) as a radioligand target during in‐vivo Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in humans to investigate the synaptic loss that strongly correlates with cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease (AD). These studies showed a decrease in the SV2A PET signal in AD patient brains compared to controls highlighting the signals potential as a clinical biomarker. However, it is currently unclear whether this decreasing signal reflects synapse loss or a loss of SV2A from within the remaining synapses. This study uses array tomography, a high‐resolution imaging technique allowing quantification of synapse density and protein colocalisation, with the intent to validate whether SV2A could be used to accurately detect synapse loss in AD. Method: We compare SV2A puncta density, localisation and intensity with synaptophysin, a well characterised pre‐synaptic marker previously used to identify AD‐associated synapse loss, in human post‐mortem tissue samples from the inferior temporal gyrus, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, entorhinal cortex, and cerebellum from end‐stage AD and age‐matched control subjects ( n = 11‐19 cases per group for each brain region). Data are analysed with linear mixed effects models and Spearman's correlations. Result: We observe strong correlations between SV2A puncta density and synaptophysin puncta density within the same tissue samples, indicating SV2A is a reliable marker of synapse density. We further observe differences between brain regions in synapse density and in disease‐associated synapse changes. Preliminary analyses of SV2A intensity within synaptic puncta do not show differences between AD and control across regions indicating remaining synapses likely do not have altered levels of SV2A protein. Conclusion: These data indicate that changes in SV2A signal observed in AD with PET imaging likely reflect changes in synapse density rather than changes in protein levels within remaining synapses. Future work with the Foundations for the National Institutes of Health SV2A project team will integrate these data with in vivo PET imaging and molecular analyses of post‐mortem tissue to provide further understanding of the biological underpinnings of SV2A PET signal with the goal of determining whether SV2A PET will be a reliable marker of synapse density for use in future clinical use.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
SV2A PET imaging likely reflects changes in actual synapse density rather than changes in protein levels within remaining synapses.
“Additionally, SV2A PET imaging likely reflects changes in actual synapse density rather than changes in protein levels within remaining synapses [92].”
From Molecular Physiology of the Neuronal Synapse (2026) · cites this paper as [92]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 1
- Authors
- Young, L., King, D., Chang, Y. Y., Holt, K., Gladstein, S., Finnema, S. J., & Spires‐Jones, T. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- UK Dementia Research Institute at the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom
- AbbVie (United States) (US)
- UK Dementia Research Institute (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Young, Lauren
- Venue
- Alzheimer's & Dementia
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2025-12
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- S2
- Pages
- e104271-e104271
- ISSN
- 1552-5260 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5279
- PMC
- PMC12742424
- OpenAlex
- W7117315864
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 0.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Alzheimer s & Dementia (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Keywords
- SV2A
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Female, Humans, Male, Membrane Glycoproteins, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Synapses, Biomarkers, Synaptophysin, Positron-Emission Tomography
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review