The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Charcot‐Marie‐Tooth disease and related neuropathies: Mutation distribution and genotype‐phenotype correlation
Abstract
Charcot‐Marie‐Tooth disease (CMT) is a genetically heterogeneous disorder that has been associated with alterations of several proteins: peripheral myelin protein 22, myelin protein zero, connexin 32, early growth response factor 2, periaxin, myotubularin related protein 2, N‐myc downstream regulated gene 1 product, neurofilament light chain, and kinesin 1B. To determine the frequency of mutations in these genes among patients with CMT or a related peripheral neuropathy, we identified 153 unrelated patients who enrolled prior to the availability of clinical testing, 79 had a 17p12 duplication (CMT1A duplication), 11 a connexin 32 mutation, 5 a myelin protein zero mutation, 5 a peripheral myelin protein 22 mutation, 1 an early growth response factor 2 mutation, 1 a periaxin mutation, 0 a myotubularin related protein 2 mutation, 1 a neurofilament light chain mutation, and 50 had no identifiable mutation; the N‐myc downstream regulated gene 1 and the kinesin 1B gene were not screened for mutations. In the process of screening the above cohort of patients as well as other patients for CMT‐causative mutations, we identified several previously unreported mutant alleles: two for connexin 32, three for myelin protein zero, and two for peripheral myelin protein 22. The peripheral myelin protein 22 mutation W28R was associated with CMT1 and profound deafness. One patient with a CMT2 clinical phenotype had three myelin protein zero mutations (I89N+V92M+I162M). Because one‐third of the mutations we report arose de novo and thereby caused chronic sporadic neuropathy, we conclude that molecular diagnosis is a necessary adjunct for clinical diagnosis and management of inherited and sporadic neuropathy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Axon-Glial Signaling and the Glial Support of Axon Function
Nave, K.-A., & Trapp, B. D. (2008) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094309 · Cited by 658
Diagnosis, natural history, and management of Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease
Pareyson, D., & Marchesi, C. (2009) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(09)70110-3 · Cited by 621
Functions and effects of creatine in the central nervous system
Andres, R. H., Ducray, A. D., Schlattner, U., Wallimann, T., & Widmer, H. R. (2008) · Brain Research Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2008.02.035 · Cited by 368
Ascorbic acid treatment corrects the phenotype of a mouse model of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease
Passage, E., Norreel, J. C., Noack-Fraissignes, P., Sanguedolce, V., Pizant, J., Thirion, X., Robaglia-Schlupp, A., Pellissier, J. F., & Fontés, M. (2004) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm1023 · Cited by 349
Sereda, M. W., Meyer zu Hörste, G., Suter, U., Uzma, N., & Nave, K.-A. (2003) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm957 · Cited by 310
Metadata
- Authors
- Boerkoel, C. F., Takashima, H., Garcia, C. A., Olney, R. K., Johnson, J., Berry, K., Russo, P., Kennedy, S., Teebi, A. S., Scavina, M., Williams, L. L., Mancias, P., Butler, I. J., Krajewski, K., Shy, M., & Lupski, J. R.
- Venue
- Annals of Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-12-13
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 190-201
- ISSN
- 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-8249
- OpenAlex
- W2119124845
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Charcot‐Marie‐Tooth disease and related neuropathies: Mutation distribution and genotype‐phenotype correlation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.10089
- The paper
- Boerkoel, C. F., Takashima, H., Garcia, C. A., Olney, R. K., Johnson, J., Berry, K., Russo, P., Kennedy, S., Teebi, A. S., Scavina, M., Williams, L. L., Mancias, P., Butler, I. J., Krajewski, K., Shy, M., & Lupski, J. R. (2002). Charcot‐Marie‐Tooth disease and related neuropathies: Mutation distribution and genotype‐phenotype correlation. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.10089
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.