Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 258

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Impact of sustained deprenyl (selegiline) in levodopa‐treated Parkinson's disease: A randomized placebo‐controlled extension of the deprenyl and tocopherol antioxidative therapy of parkinsonism trial

Shoulson, Ira, Oakes, David, Fahn, Stanley, Lang, Anthony, Langston, J. William, LeWitt, Peter, Olanow, C. Warren, Penney, John B., Tanner, Caroline, Kieburtz, Karl, Rudolph, Alice, the Parkinson Study Group·2002·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

Deprenyl (selegiline) delays the need for levodopa therapy in patients with early Parkinson's disease, but the long‐term benefits of this treatment remain unclear. During 1987 to 1988, 800 patients with early Parkinson's disease were randomized in the Deprenyl and Tocopherol Antioxidative Therapy of Parkinsonism trial to receive deprenyl, tocopherol, combined treatments, or a placebo and were then placed on active deprenyl (10mg/day). A second, independent randomization was carried out in early 1993 for 368 subjects who by that time had required levodopa and who had consented to continuing the deprenyl treatment (D subjects) or changing to a matching placebo (P subjects) under double‐blind conditions. The first development of wearing off, dyskinesias, or on–off motor fluctuations was the prespecified primary outcome measure. During the average 2‐year follow‐up, there were no differences between the treatment groups with respect to the primary outcome measure (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.63, 1.19;p= 0.38), withdrawal from the study, death, or adverse events. Although 34% of D subjects developed dyskinesias and only 19% of P subjects did (p= 0.006), only 16% of D subjects developed freezing of gait but 29% of P subjects did (p= 0.0003). Decline in motor performance was less in D subjects than P subjects. Levodopa‐treated Parkinson's disease patients who had been treated with deprenyl for up to 7 years, compared with patients who were changed to a placebo after about 5 years, experienced slower motor decline and were more likely to develop dyskinesias but less likely to develop freezing of gait.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.10191

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 258

Metadata

Authors
Shoulson, I., Oakes, D., Fahn, S., Lang, A., Langston, J. W., LeWitt, P., Olanow, C. W., Penney, J. B., Tanner, C., Kieburtz, K., Rudolph, A., & the Parkinson Study Group
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-04-23
Volume
51
Issue
5
Pages
604-612
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W2103120760
Cited by
258
References
0
FWCI
7.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of sustained deprenyl (selegiline) in levodopa‐treated Parkinson's disease: A randomized placebo‐controlled extension of the deprenyl and tocopherol antioxidative therapy of parkinsonism trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.10191
The paper
Shoulson, I., Oakes, D., Fahn, S., Lang, A., Langston, J. W., LeWitt, P., Olanow, C. W., Penney, J. B., Tanner, C., Kieburtz, K., Rudolph, A., & the Parkinson Study Group. (2002). Impact of sustained deprenyl (selegiline) in levodopa‐treated Parkinson's disease: A randomized placebo‐controlled extension of the deprenyl and tocopherol antioxidative therapy of parkinsonism trial. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.10191

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.