Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,625

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cognition and anatomy in three variants of primary progressive aphasia

Open access
Gorno‐Tempini, Maria Luisa, Dronkers, Nina F., Rankin, Katherine P., Ogar, Jennifer M., Phengrasamy, La, Rosen, Howard J., Johnson, Julene K., Weiner, Michael W., Miller, Bruce L.·2004·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

We performed a comprehensive cognitive, neuroimaging, and genetic study of 31 patients with primary progressive aphasia (PPA), a decline in language functions that remains isolated for at least 2 years. Detailed speech and language evaluation was used to identify three different clinical variants: nonfluent progressive aphasia (NFPA; n = 11), semantic dementia (SD; n = 10), and a third variant termed logopenic progressive aphasia (LPA; n = 10). Voxel‐based morphometry (VBM) on MRIs showed that, when all 31 PPA patients were analyzed together, the left perisylvian region and the anterior temporal lobes were atrophied. However, when each clinical variant was considered separately, distinctive patterns emerged: (1) NFPA, characterized by apraxia of speech and deficits in processing complex syntax, was associated with left inferior frontal and insular atrophy; (2) SD, characterized by fluent speech and semantic memory deficits, was associated with anterior temporal damage; and (3) LPA, characterized by slow speech and impaired syntactic comprehension and naming, showed atrophy in the left posterior temporal cortex and inferior parietal lobule. Apolipoprotein E ε4 haplotype frequency was 20% in NFPA, 0% in SD, and 67% in LPA. Cognitive, genetic, and anatomical features indicate that different PPA clinical variants may correspond to different underlying pathological processes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.10825

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 75 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Delis DC, 2000, California Verbal Learning Test
  2. Wechsler D, 1997, Wechsler Memory Scale (WMS‐III)
  3. Warrington EK, 1991, Visual Object and Space Perception Battery
  4. Wertz RT, 1984, Apraxia of speech: the disorders and its management, 318
  5. Duffy JR, 1995, Motor speech disorders
  6. Kertesz A, 1980, Western Aphasia Battery
  7. Howard D, 1992, Pyramids and palm trees: a test of semantic access from pictures and words., Suffolk
  8. Kay J, 1992, Psycholinguistic assessment of language processing in aphasia

Cited by

See all 1,625

Metadata

Authors
Gorno‐Tempini, M. L., Dronkers, N. F., Rankin, K. P., Ogar, J. M., Phengrasamy, L., Rosen, H. J., Johnson, J. K., Weiner, M. W., & Miller, B. L.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-02-03
Volume
55
Issue
3
Pages
335-346
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W2154633730
Cited by
1,625
References
75
FWCI
24.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cognition and anatomy in three variants of primary progressive aphasia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.10825
The paper
Gorno‐Tempini, M. L., Dronkers, N. F., Rankin, K. P., Ogar, J. M., Phengrasamy, L., Rosen, H. J., Johnson, J. K., Weiner, M. W., & Miller, B. L. (2004). Cognition and anatomy in three variants of primary progressive aphasia. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.10825

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.