Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 369

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Amphiphysin autoimmunity: Paraneoplastic accompaniments

Pittock, Sean J., Lucchinetti, Claudia F., Parisi, Joseph E., Benarroch, Eduardo E., Mokri, Bahram, Stephan, Christina L., Kim, Kwang‐Kuk, Kilimann, Manfred W., Lennon, Vanda A.·2005·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

Amphiphysin‐IgG was identified in 71 patients among 120,000 evaluated serologically for paraneoplastic autoantibodies. Clinical information was available for 63 patients. Cancer was detected in 50 (mostly limited), proven histologically in 46, and was imaged intrathoracically in 4 patients (lung, small–cell [27] and non–small cell [1]), breast [16] and melanoma [2]). Neurological accompaniments included (decreasing frequency): neuropathy, encephalopathy, myelopathy, stiff‐man phenomena, and cerebellar syndrome. In a case examined neuropathologically, parenchymal T‐lymphocyte infiltration (predominantly CD8+) was prominent in lower brainstem, spinal cord, and dorsal root ganglion. Coexisting paraneoplastic autoantibodies, identified in 74% of patients, predicted a common neoplasm and indicated other neuronal autoantigen targets that plausibly explained several neurological manifestations; for example, P/Q‐type Ca 2+‐channel antibody with Lambert–Eaton syndrome (n = 5), anti‐neuronal nuclear antibody type 1 with sensory neuronopathy (n = 7), K+‐channel antibody with limbic encephalitis (n = 1) or neuromyotonia (n = 1), and collapsin response‐mediator protein‐5‐IgG with optic neuritis (n = 3). Patients with isolated amphiphysin‐IgG (n = 19) were more likely to be women (with breast cancer, p < 0.05) and to have myelopathy or stiff‐man phenomena (p < 0.01). Overall, a minority of women (39%) and men (12%) had stiff‐man phenomena. Only 10% of women (some with lung carcinoma) and 4% of men fulfilled diagnostic criteria for stiff‐man syndrome. Ann Neurol 2005;58:96–107

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.20529

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 369

Metadata

Authors
Pittock, S. J., Lucchinetti, C. F., Parisi, J. E., Benarroch, E. E., Mokri, B., Stephan, C. L., Kim, K., Kilimann, M. W., & Lennon, V. A.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-07
Volume
58
Issue
1
Pages
96-107
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W1983650864
Cited by
369
References
2
FWCI
7.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Amphiphysin autoimmunity: Paraneoplastic accompaniments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.20529
The paper
Pittock, S. J., Lucchinetti, C. F., Parisi, J. E., Benarroch, E. E., Mokri, B., Stephan, C. L., Kim, K., Kilimann, M. W., & Lennon, V. A. (2005). Amphiphysin autoimmunity: Paraneoplastic accompaniments. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.20529

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.