The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Defining the response to interferon‐β in relapsing‐remitting multiple sclerosis patients
Abstract
Objective: Many patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) are currently receiving treatment with interferon (IFN)–β. Early identification of nonresponder patients is crucial to try different therapeutic approaches. We investigated various criteria of treatment response to assess which criterion better identifies patients with a poor response. Methods: We studied relapsing‐remitting MS (RRMS) patients treated with IFN‐β and followed them up for at least 2 years. Expanded Disability Status Score was scored every 3 months and relapses were recorded. We analyzed various criteria based on relapses, disability progression, or both. Results: Three hundred ninety‐three patients were included. After 2 years of treatment, we observed a proportion of nonresponders, ranging from 7 to 49% depending on the stringency of the criteria used. Criteria based in disability progression had higher sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. The hazard ratio for the development of marked disability after 6 years of treatment was 39.6 (95% confidence interval, 16.6–94.4) among the patients who fulfilled the criterion based only in disability progression. Interpretation: Criteria of response to IFN‐β therapy in RRMS using disability progression are more clinically relevant than those based only in relapse rate. This finding may be important for the counseling and care of RRMS patients treated with IFN‐β. Ann Neurol 2006;59:344–352
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Coles, A. J., Twyman, C. L., Arnold, D. L., Cohen, J. A., Confavreux, C., Fox, E. J., Hartung, H.-P., Havrdova, E., Selmaj, K. W., Weiner, H. L., et al. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61768-1 · Cited by 1,198
A consensus protocol for the standardization of cerebrospinal fluid collection and biobanking
Teunissen, C. E., Petzold, A., Bennett, J. L., Berven, F. S., Brundin, L., Comabella, M., Franciotta, D., Frederiksen, J. L., Fleming, J. O., Furlan, R., et al. (2009) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181c47cc2 · Cited by 845
Self-citationon behalf of the MAGNIMS study group (2015) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2015.157 · Cited by 473
Janus‐like effects of type I interferon in autoimmune diseases
Axtell, R. C., & Raman, C. (2012) · Immunological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1600-065x.2012.01131.x · Cited by 47
Plasma chitotriosidase activity in multiple sclerosis
Comabella, M., Domínguez, C., Rio, J., Martín-Gallán, P., Vilches, A., Vilarrasa, N., Espejo, C., & Montalban, X. (2009) · Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.clim.2008.12.004 · Cited by 34
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Río, J., Nos, C., Tintoré, M., Téllez, N., Galán, I., Pelayo, R., Comabella, M., & Montalban, X.
- Venue
- Annals of Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-01-25
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 344-352
- ISSN
- 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-8249
- OpenAlex
- W1968558564
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Defining the response to interferon‐β in relapsing‐remitting multiple sclerosis patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.20740
- The paper
- Río, J., Nos, C., Tintoré, M., Téllez, N., Galán, I., Pelayo, R., Comabella, M., & Montalban, X. (2006). Defining the response to interferon‐β in relapsing‐remitting multiple sclerosis patients. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.20740
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.