Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 356

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Adenosine A 2A receptor antagonist istradefylline (KW‐6002) reduces “off” time in Parkinson's disease: A double‐blind, randomized, multicenter clinical trial (6002‐US‐005)

LeWitt, Peter A., Guttman, M., Tetrud, James W., Tuite, Paul J., Mori, Akihisa, Chaikin, Philip, Sussman, Neil M., 6002‐US‐005 Study Group·2008·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

Objective: Based on new understanding of nondopaminergic pathways involved in Parkinson's disease (PD) pathophysiology, a selective adenosine A 2A receptor antagonist, istradefylline, shows promise for the treatment of PD. Methods: Istradefylline (40mg/day) was studied in levodopa‐treated PD subjects experiencing prominent wearing‐off motor fluctuations. At 23 North American sites, 196 subjects were randomized in a double‐blind, 12‐week outpatient clinical trial of istradefylline (114 completing the trial) or placebo (58 completing the trial). The primary efficacy measure was change from baseline to end point in the percentage of daily awake “off” time, recorded by subjects using a patient PD diary. Secondary end points evaluated “on” time (including “on time with dyskinesia”), the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, and a Clinical Global Impression–Improvement of Illness score. Clinical laboratory, electrocardiograms, vital signs, and adverse event monitoring comprised the safety monitoring. Results: After randomization, approximately 88% of subjects completed the double‐blind period. Compared with baseline, the decrease of daily awake “off” time for istradefylline was a mean (± standard deviation) of −10.8 ± 16.6% (95% confidence interval, −13.46 to −7.52) and for placebo, −4.0 ± 15.7% (95% confidence interval, −7.73–0.31; p = 0.007 using two‐way analysis of variance). This effect corresponded to changes from baseline in total daily awake “off” time of −1.8 ± 2.8 hours for istradefylline and −0.6 ± 2.7 hours for placebo ( p = 0.005). Treatment‐emergent adverse effects with istradefylline were generally mild. Interpretation: Istradefylline was safe, well tolerated, and offered a clinically meaningful reduction in “off” time without increased troublesome dyskinesia. Ann Neurol 2008

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.21315

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Cited by

See all 356

Metadata

Authors
LeWitt, P. A., Guttman, M., Tetrud, J. W., Tuite, P. J., Mori, A., Chaikin, P., Sussman, N. M., & 6002‐US‐005 Study Group
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-03
Volume
63
Issue
3
Pages
295-302
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W2088277236
Cited by
356
References
23
FWCI
18.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adenosine A 2A receptor antagonist istradefylline (KW‐6002) reduces “off” time in Parkinson's disease: A double‐blind, randomized, multicenter clinical trial (6002‐US‐005). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.21315
The paper
LeWitt, P. A., Guttman, M., Tetrud, J. W., Tuite, P. J., Mori, A., Chaikin, P., Sussman, N. M., & 6002‐US‐005 Study Group. (2008). Adenosine A 2A receptor antagonist istradefylline (KW‐6002) reduces “off” time in Parkinson's disease: A double‐blind, randomized, multicenter clinical trial (6002‐US‐005). Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.21315

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.