Cited by 342Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsCancer-related cognitive impairment studies

Amyloid‐β associated cortical thinning in clinically normal elderly

Open access
Becker, J. Alex, Hedden, Trey, Carmasin, Jeremy, Maye, Jacqueline, Rentz, Dorene M., Putcha, Deepti, Fischl, Bruce, Greve, Douglas N. +6 more·2011·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Both amyloid-β (Aβ) deposition and brain atrophy are associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and the disease process likely begins many years before symptoms appear. We sought to determine whether clinically normal (CN) older individuals with Aβ deposition revealed by positron emission tomography (PET) imaging using Pittsburgh Compound B (PiB) also have evidence of both cortical thickness and hippocampal volume reductions in a pattern similar to that seen in AD. METHODS: A total of 119 older individuals (87 CN subjects and 32 patients with mild AD) underwent PiB PET and high-resolution structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Regression models were used to relate PiB retention to cortical thickness and hippocampal volume. RESULTS: We found that PiB retention in CN subjects was (1) age-related and (2) associated with cortical thickness reductions, particularly in parietal and posterior cingulate regions extending into the precuneus, in a pattern similar to that observed in mild AD. Hippocampal volume reduction was variably related to Aβ deposition. INTERPRETATION: We conclude that Aβ deposition is associated with a pattern of cortical thickness reduction consistent with AD prior to the development of cognitive impairment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.22333

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is well established that the pathological burden of diverse lesions and proteinopathies can be substantial in people who are living independently and are clinically asymptomatic.

    “it is well established that the pathological burden of diverse lesions and proteinopathies can be substantial in people who are living independently and are clinically asymptomatic [103–107].”

    From The Need to Separate Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy Neuropathology from Clinical Features (2017) · cites this paper as [106]

    The Introduction reports that 25–50% of clinically normal older individuals exhibit amyloid-β deposition, and the Interpretation associates that deposition with cortical thinning before cognitive impairment. This supports substantial pathology without clinical symptoms, but the paper does not establish a burden of diverse lesions and proteinopathies or state that the participants lived independently. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The correlation between hallmark lesions and the presence and severity of disease is modest.

    “the correlation between hallmark lesions and the presence and severity of disease is modest”

    From The Need to Separate Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy Neuropathology from Clinical Features (2017) · cites this paper as [106]

    The Introduction reports that amyloid-β can accumulate before symptoms and plateaus as dementia emerges; it also notes amyloid deposition in clinically normal older people. This supports an imperfect relationship between amyloid and clinical disease, but the paper does not establish that the correlation is modest for hallmark lesions generally, including neurofibrillary tangles. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Reduced plaque formation could have a role in preventing further cortical atrophy in AD brain, as plaque deposition has been correlated with accelerated cortical atrophy.

    “reduced plaque formation could have a role in preventing further cortical atrophy in AD brain, as plaque deposition in multiple studies has been correlated with accelerated cortical atrophy [58], [59].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 76 · Cited by 342

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [4]Mintun MA Larossa GN Sheline YI [11C]PIB in a nondemented population: potential antecedent marker of Alzheimer disease Neurology 2006 67 446 452 16894106

Authors
Becker, J. A., Hedden, T., Carmasin, J., Maye, J., Rentz, D. M., Putcha, D., Fischl, B., Greve, D. N., Marshall, G. A., Salloway, S., Marks, D., Buckner, R. L., Sperling, R. A., & Johnson, K. A.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Brown University (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Johnson, Keith A.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-03-17
Volume
69
Issue
6
Pages
1032-1042
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W2098580427
Cited by
342
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 31
FWCI
18.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • Rosalinde and Arthur Gilbert Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (AG 036694)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG021910, AG036694, R01AG021910, K24AG035007, P50-AG00513421, R01AG027435, R01AG037497, P50AG005134, K23AG033634, R01AG034556, P01AG036694)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Keywords
amyloid-beta deposition, cortical thinning, cortical thickness, hippocampal volume, Alzheimer's disease, Pittsburgh compound B, amyloid PET, brain atrophy, precuneus, posterior cingulate cortex, parietal cortex, mild Alzheimer's disease, preclinical Alzheimer's disease
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Alzheimer Disease, Analysis of Variance, Aniline Compounds, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Statistics as Topic, Thiazoles, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Positron-Emission Tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review