In vivo assessment of amyloid‐β deposition in nondemented very elderly subjects
Open accessAbstract
Objective: This study examined amyloid‐β (Aβ) deposition in 190 nondemented subjects aged ≥82 years to determine the proportion of Aβ‐positive scans and associations with cognition, apolipoprotein E (APOE) status, brain volume, and Ginkgo biloba (Gb) treatment. Methods: Subjects who agreed to participate had a brain magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography scan with 11 C‐labeled Pittsburgh compound B (PiB) following completion of a Gb treatment clinical trial. The youngest subject in this imaging study was 82 years, and the mean age of the subjects was 85.5 years at the time of the scans; 152 (80%) were cognitively normal, and 38 (20%) were diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) at the time of the PiB study. Results: A high proportion of the cognitively normal subjects (51%) and MCI subjects (68%) were PiB‐positive. The APOE*4 allele was more prevalent in PiB‐positive than in PiB‐negative subjects (30% vs 6%). Measures of memory, language, and attentional functions were worse in PiB‐positive than in PiB‐negative subjects, when both normal and MCI cases were analyzed together; however, no significant associations were observed within either normal or MCI subject groups alone. There was no relationship between Gb treatment and Aβ deposition as determined by PiB. Interpretation: The data revealed a 55% prevalence of PiB positivity in nondemented subjects age >80 years and 85% PiB positivity in the APOE*4 nondemented elderly subjects. The findings also showed that long‐term exposure to Gb did not affect the prevalence of cerebral Aβ deposition. ANN NEUROL 2013;73:751–761
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
PiB-positivity was observed in 55% of non-demented subjects over 80.
“However, recent evidence comparing PiB-PET with post-mortem or biopsy results raised doubts about this method as representative of Aβ loads in the living brain [191],[192] and PiB-positivity was observed in 55% of non-demented subjects over 80 [193].”
From The overlap between vascular disease and Alzheimer’s disease - lessons from pathology (2014) · cites this paper as [193]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 54 · Cited by 98
- Authors
- Mathis, C. A., Kuller, L. H., Klunk, W. E., Snitz, B. E., Price, J. C., Weissfeld, L. A., Rosario, B. L., Lopresti, B. J., Saxton, J. A., Aizenstein, H. J., McDade, E. M., Kamboh, M. I., DeKosky, S. T., & Lopez, O. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- University of Virginia (US)
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh PA
- Corresponding author
- Mathis, Chester A.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Annals of Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-04-17
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 751-761
- ISSN
- 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-8249
- PMC
- PMC3725727
- OpenAlex
- W1908308221
- Cited by
- 98
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 15
- FWCI
- 8.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Annals of Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute on Aging (R01AG018402, P01AG025204, AG001039, RF1AG025516, P50AG005133, R01AG020226, AG025516, R01AG030653, K02AG001039, AG018402, K23AG038479, AG020226, R37AG025516, P30AG024827, R01AG025516, AG 030653)
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH070729, MH001976, K01MH001976, MH 070729)
- National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (U01AT000162)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
- Keywords
- amyloid-beta deposition, cerebral amyloid angiopathy, oldest old, cognitively normal older adults, mild cognitive impairment, APOE ε4, Pittsburgh compound B PET, Ginkgo biloba, brain volume, cognitive function, Alzheimer's disease
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aniline Compounds, Brain, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Thiazoles, Prevalence, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Positron-Emission Tomography, Cognitive Dysfunction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review