Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 256

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Autoantibodies to cytosolic 5′‐nucleotidase 1A in inclusion body myositis

Pluk, Helma, van Hoeve, Bas J. A., van Dooren, Sander H. J., Stammen‐Vogelzangs, Judith, van der Heijden, Annemarie, Schelhaas, Helenius J., Verbeek, Marcel M., Badrising, Umesh A., Arnardottir, Snjolaug, Gheorghe, Karina, Lundberg, Ingrid E., Boelens, Wilbert C., van Engelen, Baziel G., Pruijn, Ger J. M.·2013·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

Objective: Sporadic inclusion body myositis (sIBM) is an inflammatory myopathy characterized by both degenerative and autoimmune features. In contrast to other inflammatory myopathies, myositis‐specific autoantibodies had not been found in sIBM patients until recently. We used human skeletal muscle extracts as a source of antigens to detect autoantibodies in sIBM and to characterize the corresponding antigen. Methods: Autoantibodies to skeletal muscle antigens were detected by immunoblotting. The target antigen was immunoaffinity‐purified from skeletal muscle extracts and characterized by mass spectrometry. A cDNA encoding this protein was cloned and expressed in vitro, and its recognition by patient sera was analyzed in an immunoprecipitation assay. Epitopes were mapped using microarrays of overlapping peptides. Results: An M r 44,000 polypeptide (Mup44) was frequently targeted by sIBM autoantibodies. The target protein was purified, and subsequent mass spectrometry analysis revealed that Mup44 is the cytosolic 5′‐nucleotidase 1A (cN1A). By immunoprecipitation of recombinant cN1A, high concentrations of anti‐Mup44 autoantibodies were detected in 33% of sIBM patient sera, whereas their prevalence in dermatomyositis, polymyositis, and other neuromuscular disorders appeared to be rare (4.2%, 4.5%, and 3.2%, respectively). Low concentrations of anti‐Mup44 antibodies were found in myositis as well as other neuromuscular disorders, but not in healthy controls. Three major autoepitope regions of cN1A were mapped by using microarrays containing a set of overlapping peptides covering the complete cN1A amino acid sequence. Interpretation: Anti‐Mup44 autoantibodies, which are targeted to cN1A, represent the first serological biomarker for sIBM and may facilitate the diagnosis of this type of myositis. ANN NEUROL 2013;73:397–407

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.23822

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 256

Metadata

Authors
Pluk, H., van Hoeve, B. J. A., van Dooren, S. H. J., Stammen‐Vogelzangs, J., van der Heijden, A., Schelhaas, H. J., Verbeek, M. M., Badrising, U. A., Arnardottir, S., Gheorghe, K., Lundberg, I. E., Boelens, W. C., van Engelen, B. G., & Pruijn, G. J. M.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-03
Volume
73
Issue
3
Pages
397-407
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W2144067978
Cited by
256
References
1
FWCI
14.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.