Mediterranean diet, stroke, cognitive impairment, and depression: A meta‐analysis
Abstract
Objective: This meta‐analysis aims to quantitatively synthesize all studies that examine the association between adherence to a Mediterranean diet and risk of stroke, depression, cognitive impairment, and Parkinson disease. Methods: Potentially eligible publications were those providing effect estimates of relative risk (RR) for the association between Mediterranean diet and the aforementioned outcomes. Studies were sought in PubMed up to October 31, 2012. Maximally adjusted effect estimates were extracted; separate analyses were performed for high and moderate adherence. Results: Twenty‐two eligible studies were included (11 covered stroke, 9 covered depression, and 8 covered cognitive impairment; only 1 pertained to Parkinson's disease). High adherence to Mediterranean diet was consistently associated with reduced risk for stroke (RR = 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.57–0.89), depression (RR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.54–0.86), and cognitive impairment (RR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.43–0.83). Moderate adherence was similarly associated with reduced risk for depression and cognitive impairment, whereas the protective trend concerning stroke was only marginal. Subgroup analyses highlighted the protective actions of high adherence in terms of reduced risk for ischemic stroke, mild cognitive impairment, dementia, and particularly Alzheimer disease. Meta‐regression analysis indicated that the protective effects of Mediterranean diet in stroke prevention seemed more sizeable among males. Concerning depression, the protective effects of high adherence seemed independent of age, whereas the favorable actions of moderate adherence seemed to fade away with more advanced age. Interpretation: Adherence to a Mediterranean diet may contribute to the prevention of a series of brain diseases; this may be of special value given the aging of Western societies. Ann Neurol 2013;74:580–591
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
High adherence to a Mediterranean diet was shown to reduce risk across all five NCDs by between 4% and 36%.
“High adherence to a Mediterranean diet was shown to reduce risk across all five NCDs by between 4% and 36%,11,77,90,93,98”
From Common risk factors for major noncommunicable disease, a systematic overview of reviews and commentary: the implied potential for targeted risk reduction (2019) · cites this paper as [90]
A meta-analysis consisting of eight cohort studies and one case control linked a reduced risk of depression with adherence to the Mediterranean diet.
“A meta-analysis consisting of eight cohort studies and one case control, linked a reduced risk of depression with adherence to the Mediterranean diet [71].”
From Role of diet and its effects on the gut microbiome in the pathophysiology of mental disorders (2022) · cites this paper as [71]
The Mediterranean diet has been well known for various health benefits, including mental health and cognition.
“The Mediterranean diet, characterized by high intake of fruits, vegetables, legumes, nuts, olive oil, and fish, and low consumption of red meat, dairy products, and saturated fats (198), has been well known for various health benefits, including mental health and cognition (199-202).”
From Diet and the Microbiota–Gut–Brain Axis: Sowing the Seeds of Good Mental Health (2021) · cites this paper as [201]
Traditional dietary patterns from many parts of the world, such as the Norwegian and Japanese diets, also show protective associations and are correlated with reduced risk of developing depression or Alzheimer's disease as well as a general slowing of cognitive decline.
“Although the Mediterranean diet is the dietary pattern most studied in regard to health outcomes, including mental health (201), traditional dietary patterns from many parts of the world (e.g., the Norwegian and Japanese diets) also show protective associations (302, 303) and are correlated with reduced risk of developing depression or Alzheimer's disease as well as a general slowing of cognitive”
From Diet and the Microbiota–Gut–Brain Axis: Sowing the Seeds of Good Mental Health (2021) · cites this paper as [201]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 59 · Cited by 793
- Authors
- Psaltopoulou, T., Sergentanis, T. N., Panagiotakos, D. B., Sergentanis, I. N., Kosti, R., & Scarmeas, N.
- Affiliations
- Department of Hygiene Epidemiology and Medical Statistics University of Athens School of Medicine Athens Greece
- Harokopio University of Athens (GR)
- National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
- Venue
- Annals of Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-09-16
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 580-591
- ISSN
- 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-8249
- OpenAlex
- W1531103650
- Cited by
- 793
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 78 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 74 · 2018: 85 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 62 · 2014: 48 · 2013: 6
- FWCI
- 7.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Fatty Acid Research and Health
- Keywords
- Mediterranean diet, dietary adherence, stroke, ischemic stroke, depression, cognitive impairment, mild cognitive impairment, dementia, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, sex differences, aging
- MeSH terms
- Cognition Disorders, Depression, Humans, Regression Analysis, Risk, Observation, Stroke, Diet, Mediterranean, Medication Adherence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review