Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 275

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 135 of the 135 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A critique of the drug discovery and phase 3 clinical programs targeting the amyloid hypothesis for Alzheimer disease

Open access
Karran, Eric, Hardy, John·2014·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

4,500 mild-moderate AD patients randomized to placebo and 0.5mg/kg i.v.every 13 weeks for 18 months in APOE4 carriers, and randomized to placebo, 0.5, 1.0mg/kg i.v.every 13 weeks for 18 months in APOE4 noncarriers in 4 trials (ClinicalTrials.govidentifiers lNCT00575055, NCT00574132, NCT00676143, NCT00667810).Trials were halted after completion of 2 trials demonstrated a failure to meet primary outcome measures on ADAS-cog and activities of daily living.109 Solanezumab, humanized monoclonal antibody directed at amino acids 16-24 of Ab peptide.Amyloid plaque clearance mediated via peripheral sink mechanism.52 mild-moderate AD patients were randomized to placebo, 100mg every 4 weeks, 100mg weekly, 400mg every 4 weeks, 400mg weekly i.v.solanezumab for 12 weeks.There was a significant dose-dependent increase in Ab42 peptide in CSF.132 2,000 mild-moderate AD patients randomized to placebo and 400mg solanezumab monthly i.v. for 18 months (ClinicalTrials.govidentifiers NCT00905372, NCT00904683).Trials failed to meet their primary outcome measures on ADAS-cog and ADCS-ADL.A secondary analysis of mild AD patients pooled from both trials showed a significant effect on cognition.115 Gammagard, intravenous immunoglobulin.55 mild-moderate AD patients randomized to placebo, 0.2, 0.5, 0.8g/kg/4 weeks, or 0.1, 0.25, 0.4g/kg/2 weeks for 24 weeks.There was no increase in Ab40 peptide in plasma at any dose.129 Trial data currently unpublished.390 mild-moderate AD patients randomized to 0.2g/kg/2 weeks and 0.4g/kg/2 weeks vs placebo for 18 months (ClinicalTrials.govIdentifier NCT00818662).Gammagard failed to reach its coprimary outcomes of ADAS-cog and ADCS-ADL.AD 5 Alzheimer disease; ADAS-cog 5 Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale; ADCS-ADL 5 Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living Inventory; b.i.d. 5 twice daily; CDR-SB 5 Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes; CSF 5 cerebrospinal fluid; i.v. 5 intravenous; o.d. 5 once per day.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.24188

Cites

135 of 135 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 135 references

Cited by

See all 275

Metadata

Authors
Karran, E., & Hardy, J.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-07-02
Volume
76
Issue
2
Pages
185-205
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W1585083630
Cited by
275
References
135
FWCI
20.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A critique of the drug discovery and phase 3 clinical programs targeting the amyloid hypothesis for Alzheimer disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.24188
The paper
Karran, E., & Hardy, J. (2014). A critique of the drug discovery and phase 3 clinical programs targeting the amyloid hypothesis for Alzheimer disease. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.24188

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.