Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 276

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical whole exome sequencing in child neurology practice

Srivastava, Siddharth, Cohen, Julie S., Vernon, Hilary, Barañano, Kristin, McClellan, Rebecca, Jamal, Leila, Naidu, SakkuBai, Fatemi, Ali·2014·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

Objective: Whole exome sequencing (WES) represents a significant breakthrough in clinical genetics as a powerful tool for etiological discovery in neurodevelopmental disorders. To better characterize the genetic landscape of neurodevelopmental disorders, we analyzed patients in our pediatric neurogenetics clinic who underwent WES. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study on 78 patients with various neurodevelopmental disabilities and unrevealing workup prior to WES. We characterized their molecular diagnoses, clinical features, and whether their previous treatment plan changed due to WES results. Results: The overall presumptive diagnostic rate for our cohort was 41% (n = 32 of 78 patients). Nineteen patients had a single autosomal dominant (AD) disorder, 11 had a single autosomal recessive (AR) disorder, 1 had an X‐linked dominant disorder, and 1 had both an AD and an AR disorder. The 32 patients with pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants exhibited various neurobehavioral and neuroimaging abnormalities, including intellectual disability/developmental delay (n = 28), cerebral palsy–like encephalopathy (n = 11), autism spectrum disorder (n = 5), delayed/hypomyelination (n = 7), and cerebellar abnormalities (n = 9). The results of WES affected management for all patients with a presumptive diagnosis, triggering reproductive planning (n = 27), disease monitoring initiation (n = 4), investigation of systemic involvement of the disorder(s) (n = 6), alteration of presumed disease inheritance pattern (n = 7), changing of prognosis (n = 10), medication discontinuation (n = 5) or initiation (n = 2), and clinical trial education (n = 3). Interpretation: The high diagnostic yield of WES supports its use in pediatric neurology practices. It may also lead to earlier diagnosis, impacting medical management, prognostication, and family planning. WES therefore serves as a critical tool for the child neurologist. Ann Neurol 2014;76:473–483

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.24251

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Atwal PS, Clinical whole‐exome sequencing: are we there yet?, Genet Med
  2. 10.1002/ajmg.a.36398 · doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.36398
  3. 10.1038/gim.2013.94 · doi:10.1038/gim.2013.94

Cited by

See all 276

Metadata

Authors
Srivastava, S., Cohen, J. S., Vernon, H., Barañano, K., McClellan, R., Jamal, L., Naidu, S., & Fatemi, A.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-08-30
Volume
76
Issue
4
Pages
473-483
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W1490514065
Cited by
276
References
20
FWCI
14.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical whole exome sequencing in child neurology practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.24251
The paper
Srivastava, S., Cohen, J. S., Vernon, H., Barañano, K., McClellan, R., Jamal, L., Naidu, S., & Fatemi, A. (2014). Clinical whole exome sequencing in child neurology practice. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.24251

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.