The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Paramedian thalamic and midbrain infarcts: Clinical and neuropathological study
Abstract
The clinical and neuropathological findings in 28 cases of paramedian thalamic and midbrain infarcts are reported. The 4 instances of unilateral paramedian thalamic infarct were characterized by mood and behavioral changes, limitation of the infarct to the center of the anatomical paramedian territory, and symmetrical configuration of the paramedian thalamic arteries. Basilar artery occlusion was found in 1 patient. The 5 cases of bilateral paramedian thalamic infarcts were characterized by disturbances of consciousness and behavior, extension of the infarct (to the mammillothalamic tracts in 4 cases, the red nuclei in 3, and the hypothalamus in 2), and a variable paramedian thalamic arterial pattern. The arterial pattern was symmetrical in 2 cases, asymmetrical in 1, and unilateral in 1. The basilar artery was occluded in 1 case, the basilar communicating and posterior cerebral arteries in 1, and a third patient had occlusion involving an aneurysm of the basilar artery. The 19 patients with paramedian thalamopeduncular infarcts had marked disturbances of consciousness (hypersomnia, deep coma, akinetic mutism) associated with ocular motility changes. Later, abnormal movements—always delayed—and memory, disturbances were observed in some. Thalamic changes were restricted to the paramedian territory in only 3 cases. The arterial pattern was symmertical in 5. The basilar and posterior cerebral arteries were occluded in 4 patients each. Paramedian infarcts were rarely found as isolated lesions and were always bilateral when there was only one arterial pedicle. The paramedian thalamic pedicle can supply the polar thalamic territory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Episodic memory, amnesia, and the hippocampal–anterior thalamic axis
Aggleton, J. P., & Brown, M. W. (1999) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x99002034 · Cited by 1,879
Recovery of consciousness after brain injury: a mesocircuit hypothesis
Schiff, N. D. (2010) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2009.11.002 · Cited by 733
Central Thalamic Contributions to Arousal Regulation and Neurological Disorders of Consciousness
Schiff, N. D. (2008) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1417.029 · Cited by 463
Residual cerebral activity and behavioural fragments can remain in the persistently vegetative brain
Schiff, N. D., Ribary, U., Moreno, D. R., Beattie, B., Kronberg, E., Blasberg, R., Giacino, J., McCagg, C., Fins, J. J., Llinás, R., et al. (2002) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awf131 · Cited by 306
The thalamus and behavior: Effects of anatomically distinct strokes
Carrera, E., & Bogousslavsky, J. (2006) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000219679.95223.4c · Cited by 290
Metadata
- Authors
- Castaigne, P., Lhermitte, F., Buge, A., Escourolle, R., Hauw, J. J., & Lyon‐Caen, O.
- Venue
- Annals of Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1981-08
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 127-148
- ISSN
- 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-8249
- OpenAlex
- W1996813877
- Cited by
- 559
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Paramedian thalamic and midbrain infarcts: Clinical and neuropathological study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.410100204
- The paper
- Castaigne, P., Lhermitte, F., Buge, A., Escourolle, R., Hauw, J. J., & Lyon‐Caen, O. (1981). Paramedian thalamic and midbrain infarcts: Clinical and neuropathological study. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410100204
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.