Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 403

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Functional recovery of cortical neurons as related to degree and duration of ischemia

Heiss, W.‐D., Rosner, G.·1983·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

Imultaneous recordings of spontaneous single cell activity and local cerebral blood flow were obtained from 72 cortical neurons and adjacent brain in 54 cats before, during, and after ischemia induced by reversible occulsion of the middle cerebral artery. In most cells spontaneous electrical activity ceased at flow values of about 0.18 ml/gmm/in (range, 0.06 to 0.22 ml/gm/min). No signal was obtained from 28 neurons during reperfusion following ischemia of varying degree and duration. Overall, neurons exposed to a residual flow of 0.14 ml/gm/min or less for more than 45 minutes had a poorer prognosis compared to any other combination of degree and duration of ischemia. A discriminant curve was estimated to define the border line between recovering and nonrecovering cells. Regions showing irreversible neuronal failure contained selective neuronal necrosis or areas of infarction by histological examination. Reperfusion restored neuronal function in 44 cells. In this group of neurons, there was a joint interaction of duration of ischemia, ischemic residual flow, and recovery time: cells exposed to moderate ischemia (0.09 to 0.22 ml/gm/min) for up to 20 minutes recovered rapidly; most neurons subjected either to extreme ischemia (less than 0.09 ml/gm/min) of short duration (less than 20 minutes) or to moderate ischemia (0.09 to 0.22 ml/gm/min) for longer periods (20 to 141 minutes) required from 19 to 50 minutes for recovery. A few resistant neurons tolerated less than 0.09 ml/gm/min for more than 20 minutes. Cell survival and functional recovery following ischemia depend not only on separate effects of residual flow and duration of ischemia but on their combined influence. Selective vulnerability forms the natural basis of scattered cell survival.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.410140307

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 403

Metadata

Authors
Heiss, W. ‐., & Rosner, G.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1983-09
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
294-301
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W2046731614
Cited by
403
References
1
FWCI
8.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.