The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of intensive diabetes treatment on nerve conduction in the diabetes control and complications trial
Abstract
The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial demonstrated that intensive diabetes therapy effectively delays the onset of clinically apparent neuropathy in patients with insulin‐dependent diabetes mellitus. A total of 1,441 patients with insulin‐dependent diabetes mellitus were randomly assigned to receive intensive treatment or conventional treatment. Of these, 1,290 were randomized at least 41/2 years or more prior to study termination. Nerve conduction studies were performed at baseline and repeated after approximately 5 years for 1,243 of these patients, 96% of the eligible population. After 5 years of treatment, significant nerve conduction differences were observed between the intensive and conventional treatment groups, all favoring better performance (faster sensory and motor conduction velocities and shorter F‐wave latencies) in the intensive treatment group. Moreover, while performance generally deteriorated among the conventionally treated patients, most attributes remained stable or showed modest improvement in the intensively treated group. Treatment group differences were consistent across strata defined by duration of diabetes and the presence of neuropathy at baseline. A nonparametric multivariate test of all ten nerve conduction measures established a strong effect in favor of intensive treatment. These data confirm that the electrophysiological abnormalities associated with diabetic neuropathy are delayed or prevented by intensive diabetes treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reichard, P., Nilsson, B.-Y., & Rosenqvist, U. (1993) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199307293290502 · Cited by 1,202
The Effect of Intensive Diabetes Therapy on the Development and Progression of Neuropathy
The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. (1995) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-122-8-199504150-00001 · Cited by 602
Cited by
Standards of medical care in diabetes—2014
American Diabetes Association (2014) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc14-s014 · Cited by 4,572
Diabetic neuropathy: A position statement by the American Diabetes Association
Pop-Busui, R., Boulton, A. J. M., Feldman, E. L., Bril, V., Freeman, R., Malik, R. A., Sosenko, J. M., & Ziegler, D. (2017) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc16-2042 · Cited by 2,602
Backonja, M. (1998) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.280.21.1831 · Cited by 1,533
Effect of intensive therapy on the microvascular complications of type 1 diabetes mellitus
The Writing Team for the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Research Group (2002) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.287.19.2563 · Cited by 941
Pathogenesis, diagnosis and clinical management of diabetic sensorimotor peripheral neuropathy
Sloan, G., Selvarajah, D., & Tesfaye, S. (2021) · Nature Reviews Endocrinology · doi:10.1038/s41574-021-00496-z · Cited by 534
Metadata
- Authors
- DCCT Research Group, B. N.
- Venue
- Annals of Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-12
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 869-880
- ISSN
- 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-8249
- OpenAlex
- W2887886667
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of intensive diabetes treatment on nerve conduction in the diabetes control and complications trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.410380607
- The paper
- DCCT Research Group, B. N. (1995). Effect of intensive diabetes treatment on nerve conduction in the diabetes control and complications trial. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410380607
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.