The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A placebo‐controlled trial of recombinant human ciliary neurotrophic (rhCNTF) factor in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Abstract
Preclinical investigations indicated that recombinant human ciliary neurotrophic factor (rhCNTF) may have potential as therapy for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). We evaluated the safety and efficacy of rhCNTF in a prospective, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial in 570 patients with US. Patients were randomized to receive 0.5, 2, or 5 μg/kg/day rhCNTF, or placebo, for 6 months. The primary efficacy end point was the change from baseline to the last on‐ treatment value of a combination megascore for limb strength (maximum voluntary isometric contraction) and pulmonary function. Secondary end points included individual arm and leg megascores, pulmonary function tests, an activities‐of‐daily‐living outcome measure, and survival. The four treatment groups were similar at baseline with respect to age, sex, disease duration, and muscle strength values. At all doses tested, rhCNTF had no beneficial effect on the primary or secondary end points. Certain adverse events, as follows, appeared to be dose related: injection site reactions, cough, asthenia, nausea, anorexia, weight loss, and increased salivation. There was an increased number of deaths at the highest dose level. rhCNTF had no benefical effect on any measure of ALS progression. There were increased adverse events in the 5 μg/kg group and increased deaths.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A comprehensive review of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Zarei, S., Carr, K., Reiley, L., Diaz, K., Guerra, O., Altamirano, P., Pagani, W., Lodin, D., Orozco, G., & Chinea, A. (2015) · Surgical Neurology International · doi:10.4103/2152-7806.169561 · Cited by 709
Efficacy of minocycline in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a phase III randomised trial
Gordon, P. H., Moore, D. H., Miller, R. G., Florence, J. M., Verheijde, J. L., Doorish, C., Hilton, J. F., Spitalny, G. M., MacArthur, R. B., Mitsumoto, H., et al. (2007) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(07)70270-3 · Cited by 649
Self-citationVEGF: once regarded as a specific angiogenic factor, now implicated in neuroprotection
Storkebaum, E., Lambrechts, D., & Carmeliet, P. (2004) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.20092 · Cited by 507
ALS clinical trials review: 20 years of failure. Are we any closer to registering a new treatment?
Petrov, D., Mansfield, C., Moussy, A., & Hermine, O. (2017) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2017.00068 · Cited by 451
Thoenen, H., & Sendtner, M. (2002) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn938 · Cited by 336
Metadata
- Authors
- Miller, R. G., Petajan, J. H., Bryan, W. W., Armon, C., Barohn, R. J., Goodpasture, J. C., Hoagland, R. J., Parry, G. J., Ross, M. A., Stromatt, S. C., & rhCNTF ALS Study Group
- Venue
- Annals of Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-02
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 256-260
- ISSN
- 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-8249
- OpenAlex
- W2105996005
- Cited by
- 345
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A placebo‐controlled trial of recombinant human ciliary neurotrophic (rhCNTF) factor in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.410390215
- The paper
- Miller, R. G., Petajan, J. H., Bryan, W. W., Armon, C., Barohn, R. J., Goodpasture, J. C., Hoagland, R. J., Parry, G. J., Ross, M. A., Stromatt, S. C., & rhCNTF ALS Study Group. (1996). A placebo‐controlled trial of recombinant human ciliary neurotrophic (rhCNTF) factor in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410390215
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.