Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 558

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease by posterior GPi pallidotomy: 1‐year results of a pilot study

Baron, Mark S., Vitek, Jerrold L., Green, Joanne, Kaneoke, Yoshiki, Hashimoto, Takao, Turner, Robert S., Woodard, John L., Delong, Mahlon R., Bakay, Roy A. E., Cole, Steven A., McDonald, William M.·1996·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

The effects of posterior internal pallidal ablation (GPi pallidotomy) on parkinsonian signs and symptoms were studied in 15 patients with medically intracally intractable Parkinson's disease(PD). The sensorimotor territory of the internal portion of the globus pallidus and the adjacent optic tract and internal capsule were identified with microelectrode recording and stimulation. Radiofrequency lesions were then created in the identified sensorimotor territory. Pallidotomy significantly improved all cardinal parkinsonian motor signs (tremor, rigidity, akinesia/bradykinesia, and gait dysfunction) and reduced drug‐induced motor fluctuations and dyskinesias. The improvements occurred predominately contralateral to the lesion, but were also present ipsilaterally. Early postoperative (3‐month), mean total United Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale scores improved by 30.1% from preoperative values. Mean combined “on/off” Schwab and England Scale scores, a measure of functional independence, increased from 48.8% to 73.0% postoperatively. The mean total United Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale and Schwab and England scores did not show a statistically significant decline over the 1‐year postoperative period. Surgery resulted in little morbidity, including a lack of significant deficits on neuropsychological and psychiatric testing. Physical and social functioning and vitality measures on the Medical Outcome Scale also showed significant improvement over the postoperative period. The findings of this pilot study demonstrate that ablation of the sensorimotor portion of the internal pallidum is a highly effective treatment for advanced PD, with benefits sustained at 1 year.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.410400305

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 558

Metadata

Authors
Baron, M. S., Vitek, J. L., Green, J., Kaneoke, Y., Hashimoto, T., Turner, R. S., Woodard, J. L., Delong, M. R., Bakay, R. A. E., Cole, S. A., & McDonald, W. M.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-09
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
355-366
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W2010705737
Cited by
558
References
1
FWCI
46.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease by posterior GPi pallidotomy: 1‐year results of a pilot study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.410400305
The paper
Baron, M. S., Vitek, J. L., Green, J., Kaneoke, Y., Hashimoto, T., Turner, R. S., Woodard, J. L., Delong, M. R., Bakay, R. A. E., Cole, S. A., & McDonald, W. M. (1996). Treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease by posterior GPi pallidotomy: 1‐year results of a pilot study. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410400305

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.