The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia: Phenotypic differences in genetically defined subtypes?
Abstract
Seventy‐seven families with autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia were analyzed for the CAG repeat expansions causing spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) types 1, 2, 3, and 6. The SCA1 mutation accounted for 9%, SCA2 for 10%, SCA3 for 42%, and SCA6 for 22% of German ataxia families. Seven of 27 SCA6 patients had no family history of ataxia. Age at onset correlated inversely with repeat length in all subtypes. Yet the average effect of one CAG unit on onset age was different for each SCA subtype. We compared clinical, electrophysiological, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings to identify phenotypic characteristics of genetically defined SCA subtypes. Slow saccades, hyporeflexia, myoclonus, and action tremor proposed SCA2. SCA3 patients frequently developed diplopia, severe spasticity or pronounced peripheral neuropathy, and impaired temperature discrimination, apart from ataxia. SCA6 presented with a predominantly cerebellar syndrome and patients often had onset after 55 years of age. SCAI was characterized by markedly prolonged peripheral and central motor conduction times in motor evoked potentials. MRI scans showed pontine and cerebellar atrophy in SCA1 and SCA2. In SCA3, enlargement of the fourth ventricle was the main sequel of atrophy. SCA6 presented with pure cerebellar atrophy on MRI. However, overlap between the four SCA subtypes was broad.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Expansion of an unstable trinucleotide CAG repeat in spinocerebellar ataxia type 1
Orr, H. T., Chung, M.-Y., Banfi, S., Kwiatkowski, T. J., Servadio, A., Beaudet, A. L., McCall, A. E., Duvick, L. A., Ranum, L. P. W., & Zoghbi, H. Y. (1993) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng0793-221 · Cited by 1,632
Cited by
Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxias: polyglutamine expansions and beyond
Durr, A. (2010) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(10)70183-6 · Cited by 656
Nakamura, K. (2001) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/10.14.1441 · Cited by 623
Expansion of a novel CAG trinucleotide repeat in the 5′ region of PPP2R2B is associated with SCA12
Holmes, S. E., O'Hearn, E. E., McInnis, M. G., Gorelick-Feldman, D. A., Kleiderlein, J. J., Callahan, C., Kwak, N. G., Ingersoll-Ashworth, R. G., Sherr, M., Sumner, A. J., et al. (1999) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/70493 · Cited by 488
Self-citationProtein‐misfolding diseases and chaperone‐based therapeutic approaches
Chaudhuri, T. K., & Paul, S. (2006) · The FEBS Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2006.05181.x · Cited by 419
Spinocerebellar ataxia types 1, 2, 3, and 6: Disease severity and nonataxia symptoms
Schmitz-Hübsch, T., Coudert, M., Bauer, P., Giunti, P., Globas, C., Baliko, L., Filla, A., Mariotti, C., Rakowicz, M., Charles, P., et al. (2008) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000325057.33666.72 · Cited by 281
Metadata
- Authors
- Schöls, L., Amoiridis, G., Büttner, T., Przuntek, H., Epplen, J. T., & Riess, O.
- Venue
- Annals of Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-12
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 924-932
- ISSN
- 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-8249
- OpenAlex
- W2053009171
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia: Phenotypic differences in genetically defined subtypes? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.410420615
- The paper
- Schöls, L., Amoiridis, G., Büttner, T., Przuntek, H., Epplen, J. T., & Riess, O. (1997). Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia: Phenotypic differences in genetically defined subtypes? Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410420615
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.