The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Electrically active axons degenerate when exposed to nitric oxide
Abstract
Axonal degeneration is a major cause of permanent deficit in inflammatory neurological diseases such as multiple sclerosis. Axons undergo degeneration specifically at the site of the inflammatory lesions, suggesting that locally produced inflammatory factors mediate the phenomenon. One such factor is nitric oxide (NO), which we have previously reported can cause reversible conduction block in axons. Here we confirm these observations and extend them to show that axons exhibit the early stages of wallerian degeneration if they are conducting impulses at physiological frequencies while they are exposed to the low micromolar concentrations of NO that are likely to occur at sites of inflammation. Rat dorsal roots were concurrently exposed in vivo to both NO and sustained impulse activity at 1, 50, or 100 Hz. Although our in vivo observations necessarily focused on the more acute responses, morphological examination of exposed roots at the end of the recording period revealed nodal and paranodal changes consistent with acute wallerian degeneration in roots stimulated at 50 or 100 Hz. This interpretation was confirmed in a few experiments that were prolonged to permit more obvious indicators of degeneration to develop. In these experiments the formation of myelin ovoids and frank axonolysis occurred in more than 95% of fibers. Roots stimulated at only 1 Hz appeared normal. We propose that the combination of normal impulse traffic and NO at sites of inflammation may cause axonal degeneration and that electrical activity may therefore be an important factor in causing permanent disability in patients with neuroinflammatory disorders. Ann Neurol 2001;49:470–476
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Axonal transection in the lesions of multiple sclerosis
Trapp, B. D., Peterson, J., Ransohoff, R. M., Rudick, R., Mörk, S., & Bö, L. (1998) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199801293380502 · Cited by 4,029
Cited by
The Amyloid Hypothesis of Alzheimer’s Disease: Progress and Problems on the Road to Therapeutics
Hardy, J., & Selkoe, D. J. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1072994 · Cited by 13,864
Compston, A., & Coles, A. (2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)08220-x · Cited by 1,743
Cunningham, C., Wilcockson, D. C., Campion, S., Lunnon, K., & Perry, V. H. (2005) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2614-05.2005 · Cited by 768
A reversible form of axon damage in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and multiple sclerosis
Nikić, I., Merkler, D., Sorbara, C., Brinkoetter, M., Kreutzfeldt, M., Bareyre, F. M., Brück, W., Bishop, D., Misgeld, T., & Kerschensteiner, M. (2011) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.2324 · Cited by 713
Virtual hypoxia and chronic necrosis of demyelinated axons in multiple sclerosis
Trapp, B. D., & Stys, P. K. (2009) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(09)70043-2 · Cited by 621
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, K. J., Kapoor, R., Hall, S. M., & Davies, M.
- Venue
- Annals of Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-04
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 470-476
- ISSN
- 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-8249
- OpenAlex
- W2105294414
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electrically active axons degenerate when exposed to nitric oxide. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ana.96
- The paper
- Smith, K. J., Kapoor, R., Hall, S. M., & Davies, M. (2001). Electrically active axons degenerate when exposed to nitric oxide. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.96
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.