Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 167

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Are the Most Stable Fused Heterobicycles the Most Aromatic?

Subramanian, Govindan, von Ragué Schleyer, Paul, Jiao, Haijun·1996·Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English

Abstract

The authors' answer to the question in the title is: No, the most stable positional isomers of the isoelectronic heteroatom analogues (1 and 2) of the pentalene dianion are not the most aromatic. Their arguments are based on the geometric and magnetic criteria (computed magnetic susceptibilities and anisotropies, 1H NMR chemical shifts and nucleus-independent chemical shifts).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/anie.199626381

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 167

Metadata

Authors
Subramanian, G., von Ragué Schleyer, P., & Jiao, H.
Venue
Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-12
Volume
35
Issue
22
Pages
2638-2641
ISSN
0570-0833 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2066840602
Cited by
167
References
1
FWCI
8.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Are the Most Stable Fused Heterobicycles the Most Aromatic? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/anie.199626381
The paper
Subramanian, G., von Ragué Schleyer, P., & Jiao, H. (1996). Are the Most Stable Fused Heterobicycles the Most Aromatic? Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.199626381

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.