The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Catalysis: Bridging the Gap through Surface Organometallic Chemistry
Abstract
Surface organometallic chemistry is an area of heterogeneous catalysis which has recently emerged as a result of a comparative analysis of homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysis. The chemical industry has often favored heterogeneous catalysis, but the development of better catalysts has been hindered by the presence of numerous kinds of active sites and also by the low concentration of active sites. These factors have precluded a rational improvement of these systems, hence the empirical nature of heterogeneous catalysis. Catalysis is primarily a molecular phenomenon, and it must involve well‐defined surface organometallic intermediates and/or transition states. Thus, one must be able to construct a well‐defined active site, test its catalytic performance, and assess a structure–activity relationship, which will be used, in turn—as in homogeneous catalysis—to design better catalysts. By the transfer of the concepts and tools of molecular organometallic chemistry to surfaces, surface organometallic chemistry can generate well‐defined surface species by understanding the reaction of organometallic complexes with the support, which can be considered as a rigid ligand. This new approach to heterogeneous catalysis can bring molecular insight to the design of new catalysts and even allow the discovery of new reactions (Ziegler–Natta depolymerization and alkane metathesis). After more than a century of existence, heterogeneous catalysis can still be improved and will play a crucial role in solving current problems. It offers an answer to economical and environmental problems faced by industry in the production of molecules (agrochemicals, petrochemicals, pharmaceuticals, polymers, basic chemicals).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fei, H., Dong, J., Feng, Y., Allen, C. S., Wan, C., Volosskiy, B., Li, M., Zhao, Z., Wang, Y., Sun, H., et al. (2018) · Nature Catalysis · doi:10.1038/s41929-017-0008-y · Cited by 1,973
Single atom electrocatalysts supported on graphene or graphene-like carbons
Fei, H., Dong, J., Chen, D., Hu, T., Duan, X., Shakir, I., Huang, Y., & Duan, X. (2019) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c9cs00422j · Cited by 673
The Power of Single‐Atom Catalysis
Liang, S., Hao, C., & Shi, Y. (2015) · ChemCatChem · doi:10.1002/cctc.201500363 · Cited by 365
Rosal, I. D., Poteau, R., & Maron, L. (2011) · Dalton Transactions · doi:10.1039/c1dt10566c · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Copéret, C., Chabanas, M., Petroff Saint‐Arroman, R., & Basset, J.
- Venue
- Angewandte Chemie International Edition
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-01-13
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 156-181
- ISSN
- 1433-7851 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-3773
- OpenAlex
- W2006792934
- Cited by
- 1,079
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 30.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.