Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 223

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Synthesis, Anion‐Binding Properties, and In Vitro Anticancer Activity of Prodigiosin Analogues

Sessler, Jonathan L., Eller, Leah R., Cho, Won‐Seob, Nicolaou, Sergios, Aguilar, Apolonio, Lee, Jeong Tae, Lynch, Vincent M., Magda, Darren J.·2005·Angewandte Chemie International Edition

Abstract

Pro and anti: Recognition of chloride ion and through-membrane H+/Cl− ion transport (“symport”) could account for the biological effects (anticancer activity) of prodigiosin, as inferred from model studies involving pyrrole-based anion receptors designed to mimic the key features of this naturally occurring pigment (see picture).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/anie.200501740

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 223

Metadata

Authors
Sessler, J. L., Eller, L. R., Cho, W., Nicolaou, S., Aguilar, A., Lee, J. T., Lynch, V. M., & Magda, D. J.
Venue
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-09-14
Volume
44
Issue
37
Pages
5989-5992
ISSN
  • 1433-7851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-3773
OpenAlex
W2160884908
Cited by
223
References
0
FWCI
4.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Synthesis, Anion‐Binding Properties, and In Vitro Anticancer Activity of Prodigiosin Analogues. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/anie.200501740
The paper
Sessler, J. L., Eller, L. R., Cho, W., Nicolaou, S., Aguilar, A., Lee, J. T., Lynch, V. M., & Magda, D. J. (2005). Synthesis, Anion‐Binding Properties, and In Vitro Anticancer Activity of Prodigiosin Analogues. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200501740

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.