Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 385

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Electrochemical Alternatives for Drinking Water Disinfection

Martínez‐Huitle, Carlos A., Brillas, Enric·2008·Angewandte Chemie International Edition

Abstract

Chlorination is the most common method worldwide for the disinfection of drinking water. However, the identification of potentially toxic products from this method has encouraged the development of alternative disinfection technologies. Among them, electrochemical disinfection has emerged as one of the more feasible alternatives to chlorination. This article reviews electrochemical systems that can contribute to drinking water disinfection and underscores the efficiency of recently developed diamond films in chlorine‐free electrochemical systems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/anie.200703621

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 385

Metadata

Authors
Martínez‐Huitle, C. A., & Brillas, E.
Venue
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-02-22
Volume
47
Issue
11
Pages
1998-2005
ISSN
  • 1433-7851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-3773
OpenAlex
W2025739237
Cited by
385
References
0
FWCI
7.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electrochemical Alternatives for Drinking Water Disinfection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/anie.200703621
The paper
Martínez‐Huitle, C. A., & Brillas, E. (2008). Electrochemical Alternatives for Drinking Water Disinfection. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200703621

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.