The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ruthenium‐Catalyzed Direct Methylation of Primary and Secondary Aromatic Amines Using Carbon Dioxide and Molecular Hydrogen
Abstract
The effective catalytic N-methylation of anilines using CO2 as C1 source and molecular hydrogen as reducing agent was demonstrated using the well-defined [Ru(triphos)(tmm)] catalyst. Secondary and primary (shown) aromatic amines were mono- or dialkylated, respectively, in high yields. N-methylation of amides coupled with the amide hydrogenation offers an efficient approach to unsymmetrical tertiary methyl/alkyl/aromatic amines.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Klankermayer, J., Wesselbaum, S., Beydoun, K., & Leitner, W. (2016) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201507458 · Cited by 856
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Beydoun, K., vom Stein, T., Klankermayer, J., & Leitner, W.
- Venue
- Angewandte Chemie International Edition
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-08-14
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 36
- Pages
- 9554-9557
- ISSN
- 1433-7851 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-3773
- OpenAlex
- W4230366934
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ruthenium‐Catalyzed Direct Methylation of Primary and Secondary Aromatic Amines Using Carbon Dioxide and Molecular Hydrogen. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/anie.201304656
- The paper
- Beydoun, K., vom Stein, T., Klankermayer, J., & Leitner, W. (2013). Ruthenium‐Catalyzed Direct Methylation of Primary and Secondary Aromatic Amines Using Carbon Dioxide and Molecular Hydrogen. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201304656
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
