The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Visible‐Light Photocatalysis: Does It Make a Difference in Organic Synthesis?
Abstract
Visible‐light photocatalysis has evolved over the last decade into a widely used method in organic synthesis. Photocatalytic variants have been reported for many important transformations, such as cross‐coupling reactions, α‐amino functionalizations, cycloadditions, ATRA reactions, or fluorinations. To help chemists select photocatalytic methods for their synthesis, we compare in this Review classical and photocatalytic procedures for selected classes of reactions and highlight their advantages and limitations. In many cases, the photocatalytic reactions proceed under milder reaction conditions, typically at room temperature, and stoichiometric reagents are replaced by simple oxidants or reductants, such as air, oxygen, or amines. Does visible‐light photocatalysis make a difference in organic synthesis? The prospect of shuttling electrons back and forth to substrates and intermediates or to selectively transfer energy through a visible‐light‐absorbing photocatalyst holds the promise to improve current procedures in radical chemistry and to open up new avenues by accessing reactive species hitherto unknown, especially by merging photocatalysis with organo‐ or metal catalysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prier, C. K., Rankic, D. A., & MacMillan, D. W. C. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr300503r · Cited by 9,590
Tornøe, C. W., Christensen, C., & Meldal, M. (2002) · The Journal of Organic Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jo011148j · Cited by 8,696
Cited by
Heterogeneous Single-Atom Photocatalysts: Fundamentals and Applications
Gao, C., Low, J., Long, R., Kong, T., Zhu, J., & Xiong, Y. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00840 · Cited by 1,050
Triplet Energy Transfer Photocatalysis: Unlocking the Next Level
Strieth-Kalthoff, F., & Glorius, F. (2020) · Chem · doi:10.1016/j.chempr.2020.07.010 · Cited by 650
Visible-Light-Driven Reductive Carboarylation of Styrenes with CO 2 and Aryl Halides
Wang, H., Gao, Y., Zhou, C., & Li, G. (2020) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.0c03144 · Cited by 303
Xu, J., Cao, J., Wu, X., Wang, H., Yang, X., Tang, X., Toh, R. W., Zhou, R., Yeow, E. K. L., & Wu, J. (2021) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.1c05994 · Cited by 280
Dai, Y., Poidevin, C., Ochoa‐Hernández, C., Auer, A. A., & Tüysüz, H. (2020) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201915034 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Marzo, L., Pagire, S. K., Reiser, O., & König, B.
- Venue
- Angewandte Chemie International Edition
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-06-29
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 32
- Pages
- 10034-10072
- ISSN
- 1433-7851 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-3773
- OpenAlex
- W2794166887
- Cited by
- 2,178
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 83.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Visible‐Light Photocatalysis: Does It Make a Difference in Organic Synthesis? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/anie.201709766
- The paper
- Marzo, L., Pagire, S. K., Reiser, O., & König, B. (2018). Visible‐Light Photocatalysis: Does It Make a Difference in Organic Synthesis? Angewandte Chemie International Edition. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201709766
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.