Cited by 166Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionConducting polymers and applicationsCO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts

Spatially Confined Assembly of Monodisperse Ruthenium Nanoclusters in a Hierarchically Ordered Carbon Electrode for Efficient Hydrogen Evolution

Wang, Zhong‐Li, Sun, Keju, Henzie, Joel, Hao, Xianfeng, Li, Cuiling, Takei, Toshiaki, Kang, Yong‐Mook, Yamauchi, Yusuke·2018·Angewandte Chemie International Edition

Abstract

The redox units of polyaniline (PAni) are used cooperatively, and in situ, to assemble ruthenium (Ru) nanoclusters in a hierarchically ordered carbon electrode. The oxidized quinonoid imine (QI) units in PAni bond Ru complex ions selectively, whereas reduced benzenoid amine (BA) units cannot. By electrochemically tuning the ratio of QI to BA, Ru complexes are spatially confined in the outer layer of hierarchical PAni frameworks. Carbonization of Ru-PAni hybrids induces nucleation on the outer surface of the carbon support, generating nearly monodisperse Ru nanoclusters. The optimized catalyst has a low loading of approximately 2 wt % Ru, but exhibits a mass activity for the hydrogen evolution reaction that is about 6.8 times better than commercial 20 wt % Pt/C catalyst.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/anie.201801467

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ruthenium has emerged as an attractive candidate for HER largely because of a moderate Ru-H bond strength analogous to Pt-H, which is conducive to facile HER kinetics.

    “ruthenium (Ru) has emerged as an attractive candidate, largely because of a moderate strength of the ruthenium-hydrogen (Ru-H) bond that is analogous to that of Pt-H, which is conducive to facile HER kinetics [9–18]”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 47 · Cited by 166

Authors
Wang, Z., Sun, K., Henzie, J., Hao, X., Li, C., Takei, T., Kang, Y., & Yamauchi, Y.
Affiliations
  • International Center for Materials Nanoarchitectonics (WPI-MANA) National Institute for Materials Science (NIMS) 1-1 Namiki Tsukuba Ibaraki 305-0044 Japan
  • Yanshan University (CN)
  • National Institute for Materials Science (JP)
  • Dongguk University (KR)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
  • Henzie, Joel
  • Yamauchi, Yusuke
Venue
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-04-14
Volume
57
Issue
20
Pages
5848-5852
ISSN
  • 1433-7851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-3773
OpenAlex
W2800116646
Cited by
166
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 9
FWCI
5.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Angewandte Chemie International Edition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (15F15766, 17K19044)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Conducting polymers and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
Keywords
ruthenium nanoclusters, hydrogen evolution reaction, polyaniline, spatial confinement, carbonization, nucleation, low ruthenium loading, electrocatalysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review