Channel‐Rich RuCu Nanosheets for pH‐Universal Overall Water Splitting Electrocatalysis
Open accessAbstract
Channel‐rich RuCu snowflake‐like nanosheets (NSs) composed of crystallized Ru and amorphous Cu were used as efficient electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution reaction (OER), hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), and overall water splitting in pH‐universal electrolytes. The optimized RuCu NSs/C‐350 °C and RuCu NSs/C‐250 °C show attractive activities of OER and HER with low overpotentials and small Tafel slopes, respectively. When applied to overall water splitting, the optimized RuCu NSs/C can reach 10 mA cm−2 at cell voltages of only 1.49, 1.55, 1.49 and 1.50 V in 1 m KOH, 0.1 m KOH, 0.5 m H 2 SO 4 and 0.05 m H 2 SO 4, respectively, much lower than those of commercial Ir/C∥Pt/C. The optimized electrolyzer exhibits superior durability with small potential change after up to 45 h in 1 m KOH, showing a class of efficient functional electrocatalysts for overall water splitting.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
After the OER test, Ru0.7Co0.3 aerogel exhibits new Ru 3p peaks at 468.9 eV and 489.4 eV, attributable to Ru 3p3/2 and Ru 3p1/2 of Run+ (n > 4).
“the Ru0.7Co0.3 aerogel after the OER test exhibits new peaks located at 468.9 eV and 489.4 eV, which can be attributed to Ru 3p3/2 and Ru 3p1/2 of Run+ (n > 4)”
From Rational design of Ru aerogel and RuCo aerogels with abundant oxygen vacancies for hydrogen evolution reaction, oxygen evolution reaction, and overall water splitting (2021) · cites this paper as [46]
The indexed text (section labelled Abstract; page unavailable) studies RuCu nanosheets, not a Ru0.7Co0.3 aerogel. It assigns Ru 3p3/2 peaks at 461.8, 463.7 and 465.5 eV and says XPS showed the RuCu surface was hardly changed after OER stability tests, contrary to the claimed new post-test peaks at 468.9 and 489.4 eV. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 46 · Cited by 378
Research works printed but not linked: 33
- B. Rausch, M. D. Symes, G. Chisholm, L. Cronin, Science 2014, 345, 1326.
- J. Wang, W. Cui, Q. Liu, Z. Xing, A. M. Asiri, X. Sun, Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 215-230.
- Y. H. Li, P. F. Liu, L. F. Pan, H. F. Wang, Z. Z. Yang, L. R. Zheng, P. Hu, H. J. Zhao, L. Gu, H. G. Yang, Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8064.
- W. Zhou, X.-J. Wu, X. Cao, X. Huang, C. Tan, J. Tian, H. Liu, J. Wang, H. Zhang, Energy Environ. Sci. 2013, 6, 2921-2924.
- X. Gao, H. Zhang, Q. Li, X. Yu, Z. Hong, X. Zhang, C. Liang, Z. Lin, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 6290-6294.
- J. Hou, B. Zhang, Z. Li, S. Cao, Y. Sun, Y. Wu, Z. Gao, L. Sun, ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 4612- 4621.
- M. Gong, W. Zhou, M. C. Tsai, J. Zhou, M. Guan, M. C. Lin, B. Zhang, Y. Hu, D. Y. Wang, J. Yang, S. J. Pennycook, B. J. Hwang, H. Dai, Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 4695.
- Y. Yan, B. Xia, Z. Xu, X. Wang, ACS Catal. 2014, 4, 1693-1705.
- T. Wang, C. Wang, Y. Jin, A. Sviripa, J. Liang, J. Han, Y. Huang, Q. Li, G. Wu, J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 25378-25384.
- Y. Jiao, Y. Zheng, M. Jaroniec, S. Z. Qiao, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 2060-2086.
- E. Antolini, ACS Catal. 2014, 4, 1426-1440.
- J. Zhang, T. Wang, D. Pohl, B. Rellinghaus, R. Dong, S. Liu, X. Zhuang, X. Feng, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 6702-6707.
- L. Fan, P. F. Liu, X. Yan, L. Gu, Z. Z. Yang, H. G. Yang, S. Qiu, X. Yao, Nat Commun. 2016, 7, 10667.
- Z. Geng, Y. Liu, X. Kong, P. Li, K. Li, Z. Liu, J. Du, M. Shu, R. Si, J. Zeng, Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1803498
- X. Cui, A. E. Surkus, K. Junge, C. Topf, J. Radnik, C. Kreyenschulte, M. Beller, Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11326.
- Y. Liu, S. Liu, Y. Wang, Q. Zhang, L. Gu, S. Zhao, D. Xu, Y. Li, J. Bao, Z. Dai, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 2731-2734.
- L. Gloag, T. M. Benedetti, S. Cheong, Y. Li, X. H. Chan, L. M. Lacroix, S. L. Y. Chang, R. Arenal, I. Florea, H. Barron, A. S. Barnard, A. M. Henning, C. Zhao, W. Schuhmann, J. J. Gooding, R. D. Tilley, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 10241-10245.
- J. Su, Y. Yang, G. Xia, J. Chen, P. Jiang, Q. Chen, Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14969.
- J. Liu, Y. Zheng, Y. Jiao, Z. Wang, Z. Lu, A. Vasileff, S. Z. Qiao, Small 2018, 14, e1704073.
- J. Su, R. Ge, K. Jiang, Y. Dong, F. Hao, Z. Tian, G. Chen, L. Chen, Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1801351.
- S. W. Liu, Hk. P. Wang, Q. Xu, T. B. Ma, G. Yu, C. Zhang, D. Geng, Z. Yu, S. Zhang, W. Wang, Y. Z. Hu, H. Wang, J. Luo, Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14029.
- X. Hong, C. Tan, J. Chen, Z. Xu, H. Zhang, Nano Research 2014, 8, 40-55.
- S. Sun, H. Li, Z. J. Xu, Joule 2018, 2, 1024-1027.
- C. Zhu, Q. Shi, S. Fu, J. Song, H. Xia, D. Du, Y. Lin, Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 8779-8783.
- J. Yu, Y. Zhong, X. Wu, J. Sunarso, M. Ni, W. Zhou, Z. Shao, Adv. Sci. 2018, 5, 1800514.
- R. Ma, Y. Zhou, Y. Chen, P. Li, Q. Liu, J. Wang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 14723- 14727.
- P. Xiao, M. A. Sk, L. Thia, X. Ge, R. J. Lim, J.-Y. Wang, K. H. Lim, X. Wang, Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 2624-2629.
- Y. Jin, H. Wang, J. Li, X. Yue, Y. Han, P. K. Shen, Y. Cui, Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 3785-3790.
- Z. Zhang, Y. Liu, B. Chen, Y. Gong, L. Gu, Z. Fan, N. Yang, Z. Lai, Y. Chen, J. Wang, Y. Huang, M. Sindoro, W. Niu, B. Li, Y. Zong, Y. Yang, X. Huang, F. Huo, W. Huang, H. Zhang, Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 10282-10286.
- K. Sardar, E. Petrucco, C. I. Hiley, J. D. Sharman, P. P. Wells, A. E. Russell, R. J. Kashtiban, J. Sloan, R. I. Walton, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 10960-10964.
- L. Shi, T. Zhao, A. Xu, Z. Wei, ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 6285-6293.
- E. Yilmaz, C. Yogi, K. Yamanaka, T. Ohta, H. R. Byon, Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 4679-4684.
- B. Lu, L. Guo, F. Wu, Y. Peng, J. E. Lu, T. J. Smart, N. Wang, Y. Z. Finfrock, D. Morris, P. Zhang, N. Li, P. Gao, Y. Ping, S. Chen, Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 63
- Authors
- Yao, Q., Huang, B., Zhang, N., Sun, M., Shao, Q., & Huang, X.
- Affiliations
- Soochow University (CN)
- Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
- Corresponding author
- Huang, Xiaoqing
- Venue
- Angewandte Chemie International Edition
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-08-14
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 39
- Pages
- 13983-13988
- ISSN
- 1433-7851 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-3773
- OpenAlex
- W2963912632
- Cited by
- 378
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 80 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 7
- FWCI
- 1.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Angewandte Chemie International Edition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PolyU Institutional Research Archive (Hong Kong Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (21571135, BK20170003, 2017YFA0208200, 2016YFA0204100)
- Government of Jiangsu Province (BK20170003)
- Soochow University (BK20170003, 2016YFA0204100, 21571135, 2017YFA0208200)
- Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (2017YFA0208200, 2016YFA0204100, BK20170003, 21571135)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
- Keywords
- oxygen evolution reaction, hydrogen evolution reaction, overall water splitting, amorphous copper, electrocatalysts, electrolyzer durability, sulfuric acid electrolysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review