Defect‐Mediated Ordering of Condensed Water Structures in Microporous Zeolites
Abstract
Ab‐initio molecular dynamics simulations and transmission infrared spectroscopy are employed to characterize the structure of water networks in defect‐functionalized microporous zeolites. Thermodynamically stable phases of clustered water molecules are localized at some of the defects in zeolite Beta, which include catalytic sites such as framework Lewis acidic Sn atoms in closed and hydrolyzed‐open forms, as well as silanol nests. These water clusters compete with ideal gas‐like structures at low water densities and pore‐filling phases at higher water densities, with the equilibrium phase determined by the water chemical potential. The physical characteristics of these phases are determined by the defect identity, with the local binding and orientation of hydroxyl moieties around the defects playing a central role. The results suggest general principles for how the structure of polar solvents in microporous solid acids is influenced by local defect functionalization, and the thermodynamic stability of the condensed phases surrounding such sites, in turn, implies that the catalysis of Lewis acids will be influenced by local water ordering.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The BAS-water-zeolite interaction is not adequately viewed as a simple bulk-liquid interface, but rather as a collection of complex binding, clustering, exchange, and reaction steps between variously sized water clusters and an inhomogeneous surface complicated by topology-dependent confinement effects.
“Owing to the microporous nature of zeolites, this interaction is not adequately viewed as a simple bulk-liquid interface, but rather a collection of complex binding, clustering, exchange, and reaction steps between variously sized water clusters and an inhomogeneous surface that is complicated by topology-dependent confinement effects12.”
From A reactive neural network framework for water-loaded acidic zeolites (2024) · cites this paper as [12]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 59
- Authors
- Bukowski, B. C., Bates, J. S., Gounder, R., & Greeley, J.
- Affiliations
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- Corresponding author
- Greeley, Jeffrey
- Venue
- Angewandte Chemie International Edition
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-10
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 46
- Pages
- 16422-16426
- ISSN
- 1433-7851 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-3773
- OpenAlex
- W4245175496
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 3.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Angewandte Chemie International Edition (publishedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy (DE-SC0010379)
- 3M (Non-tenured Faculty Award)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Microwave-Assisted Synthesis and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
- Keywords
- microporous zeolites, beta zeolite, water clusters, water ordering, Lewis acid sites, silanol nests, chemical potential of water, phase equilibria, hydroxyl group orientation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review