The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lithium–Sulfur Batteries under Lean Electrolyte Conditions: Challenges and Opportunities
Abstract
The development of energy‐storage devices has received increasing attention as a transformative technology to realize a low‐carbon economy and sustainable energy supply. Lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries are considered to be one of the most promising next‐generation energy‐storage devices due to their ultrahigh energy density. Despite the extraordinary progress in the last few years, the actual energy density of Li–S batteries is still far from satisfactory to meet the demand for practical applications. Considering the sulfur electrochemistry is highly dependent on solid‐liquid‐solid multi‐phase conversion, the electrolyte amount plays a primary role in the practical performances of Li–S cells. Therefore, a lean electrolyte volume with low electrolyte/sulfur ratio is essential for practical Li–S batteries, yet under these conditions it is highly challenging to achieve acceptable electrochemical performances regarding sulfur kinetics, discharge capacity, Coulombic efficiency, and cycling stability especially for high‐sulfur‐loading cathodes. In this Review, the impact of the electrolyte/sulfur ratio on the actual energy density and the economic cost of Li–S batteries is addressed. Challenges and recent progress are presented in terms of the sulfur electrochemical processes: the dissolution–precipitation conversion and the solid–solid multi‐phasic transition. Finally, prospects of future lean‐electrolyte Li–S battery design and engineering are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Armand, M., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/451652a · Cited by 19,612
Cited by
Li-S Batteries: Challenges, Achievements and Opportunities
Raza, H., Bai, S., Cheng, J., Majumder, S., Zhu, H., Liu, Q., Zheng, G., Li, X., & Chen, G. (2023) · Electrochemical Energy Reviews · doi:10.1007/s41918-023-00188-4 · Cited by 406
Ng, S., Lau, M. Y. L., & Ong, W. (2021) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202008654 · Cited by 404
Electrochemical energy storage devices working in extreme conditions
Chen, M., Zhang, Y., Xing, G., Chou, S.-L., & Tang, Y. (2021) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d1ee00271f · Cited by 346
Hou, L.-P., Zhang, X.-Q., Li, B.-Q., & Zhang, Q. (2021) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2020.10.021 · Cited by 283
Self-citationDefect Engineering for Expediting Li–S Chemistry: Strategies, Mechanisms, and Perspectives
Shi, Z., Li, M., Sun, J., & Chen, Z. (2021) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.202100332 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, M., Li, B., Peng, H., Yuan, H., Wei, J., & Huang, J.
- Venue
- Angewandte Chemie International Edition
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-03-17
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 31
- Pages
- 12636-12652
- ISSN
- 1433-7851 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-3773
- OpenAlex
- W2971618535
- Cited by
- 663
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 29.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lithium–Sulfur Batteries under Lean Electrolyte Conditions: Challenges and Opportunities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/anie.201909339
- The paper
- Zhao, M., Li, B., Peng, H., Yuan, H., Wei, J., & Huang, J. (2020). Lithium–Sulfur Batteries under Lean Electrolyte Conditions: Challenges and Opportunities. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201909339
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.