Cited by 241CO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsCatalysts for Methane ReformingAdvanced Photocatalysis Techniques

Facile Synthesis of Sub‐Nanometric Copper Clusters by Double Confinement Enables Selective Reduction of Carbon Dioxide to Methane

Hu, Qi, Han, Zhen, Wang, Xiaodeng, Li, Guomin, Wang, Ziyu, Huang, Xiaowan, Yang, Hengpan, Ren, Xiangzhong +3 more·2020·Angewandte Chemie International Edition

Abstract

Previous density-functional theory (DFT) calculations show that sub-nanometric Cu clusters (i.e., 13 atoms) favorably generate CH 4 from the CO 2 reduction reaction (CO 2 RR), but experimental evidence is lacking. Herein, a facile impregnation-calcination route towards Cu clusters, having a diameter of about 1.0 nm with about 10 atoms, was developed by double confinement of carbon defects and micropores. These Cu clusters enable high selectivity for the CO 2 RR with a maximum Faraday efficiency of 81.7 % for CH 4 . Calculations and experimental results show that the Cu clusters enhance the adsorption of *H and *CO intermediates, thus promoting generation of CH 4 rather than H 2 and CO. The strong interactions between the Cu clusters and defective carbon optimize the electronic structure of the Cu clusters for selectivity and stability towards generation of CH 4 . Provided here is the first experimental evidence that sub-nanometric Cu clusters facilitate the production of CH 4 from the CO 2 RR.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/anie.202009277

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Traditional supports on the micrometer scale are usually not compatible with catalysts on the nanoscale and therefore do not contribute considerably to the intrinsic catalytic activity.

    “traditional supports on the micrometer scale are usually not compatible with the catalysts on the nanoscale and therefore do not contribute considerably to the intrinsic catalytic activity.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hu, Q., Han, Z., Wang, X., Li, G., Wang, Z., Huang, X., Yang, H., Ren, X., Zhang, Q., Liu, J., & He, C.
Affiliations
Shenzhen University (CN)
Corresponding author
He, Chuanxin
Venue
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-08-26
Volume
59
Issue
43
Pages
19054-19059
ISSN
  • 1433-7851 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-3773
OpenAlex
W3043455741
Cited by
241
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 5
FWCI
7.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Angewandte Chemie International Edition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (21975162, 51902208)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Catalysts for Methane Reforming
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
Keywords
CO2 reduction, methane selectivity, carbon defects, micropores, hydrogen adsorption, CO adsorption, defective carbon, electronic structure, Faradaic efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review