The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evolution of Cationic Vacancy Defects: A Motif for Surface Restructuration of OER Precatalyst
Abstract
Defects have been found to enhance the electrocatalytic performance of NiFe‐LDH for oxygen evolution reaction (OER). Nevertheless, their specific configuration and the role played in regulating the surface reconstruction of electrocatalysts remain ambiguous. Herein, cationic vacancy defects are generated via aprotic‐solvent‐solvation‐induced leaking of metal cations from NiFe‐LDH nanosheets. DFT calculation and in situ Raman spectroscopic observation both reveal that the as‐generated cationic vacancy defects tend to exist as V M (M=Ni/Fe); under increasing applied voltage, they tend to assume the configuration V MOH, and eventually transform into V MOH‐H which is the most active yet most difficult to form thermodynamically. Meanwhile, with increasing voltage the surface crystalline Ni(OH)x in the NiFe‐LDH is gradually converted into disordered status; under sufficiently high voltage when oxygen bubbles start to evolve, local NiOOH species become appearing, which is the residual product from the formation of vacancy V MOH‐H. Thus, we demonstrate that the cationic defects evolve along with increasing applied voltage (V M → V MOH → V MOH‐H), and reveal the essential motif for the surface restructuration process of NiFe‐LDH (crystalline Ni(OH)x → disordered Ni(OH)x → NiOOH). Our work provides insight into defect‐induced surface restructuration behaviors of NiFe‐LDH as a typical precatalyst for efficient OER electrocatalysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jiang, K., Liu, B., Luo, M., Ning, S., Peng, M., Zhao, Y., Lu, Y.-R., Chan, T.-S., de Groot, F. M. F., & Tan, Y. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09765-y · Cited by 670
Duan, Y., Yu, Z., Hu, S., Zheng, X., Zhang, C., Ding, H., Hu, B., Fu, Q., Yu, Z., Zheng, X., et al. (2019) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201909939 · Cited by 625
Du, L., Xing, L., Zhang, G., Dubois, M., & Sun, S. (2020) · Small Methods · doi:10.1002/smtd.202000016 · Cited by 91
Self-citation
Cited by
Guo, L., Chi, J., Cui, T., Zhu, J., Xia, Y., Guo, H., Lai, J., & Wang, L. (2024) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.202400975 · Cited by 268
Electrocatalysts for the Oxygen Evolution Reaction: Mechanism, Innovative Strategies, and Beyond
Wen, N., Jiao, X., Xia, Y., & Chen, D. (2023) · Materials Chemistry Frontiers · doi:10.1039/d3qm00423f · Cited by 104
Xu, C., Zhang, M., Yin, X., Gao, Q., Jiang, S., Cheng, J., Kong, X., Liu, B., & Peng, H.-Q. (2023) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/d3ta02293e · Cited by 65
Fu, Y., Liu, Y., Jin, G., Guo, H., Liu, H., & Wang, C. (2025) · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.5c00618 · Cited by 8
Li, Y., Wang, W., Wang, M., Liu, K., Song, X., & Ma, B. (2025) · Journal of Alloys and Compounds · doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2025.179677 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Wu, Y., Yang, J., Tu, T., Li, W., Zhang, P., Zhou, Y., Li, J., Li, J., & Sun, S.
- Venue
- Angewandte Chemie International Edition
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-11-10
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 51
- Pages
- 26829-26836
- ISSN
- 1433-7851 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-3773
- OpenAlex
- W3206015591
- Cited by
- 599
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 15.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evolution of Cationic Vacancy Defects: A Motif for Surface Restructuration of OER Precatalyst. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/anie.202112447
- The paper
- Wu, Y., Yang, J., Tu, T., Li, W., Zhang, P., Zhou, Y., Li, J., Li, J., & Sun, S. (2021). Evolution of Cationic Vacancy Defects: A Motif for Surface Restructuration of OER Precatalyst. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202112447
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.