Unravelling the Functional Diversity of Type III Polyketide Synthases in Fungi
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Type III polyketide synthases (T3PKSs) are enzymes that produce diverse compounds of ecological and clinical importance. While well‐studied in plants, only a handful of T3PKSs from fungi have been characterised to date. Here, we developed a comprehensive workflow for kingdom‐wide characterisation of T3PKSs. Using publicly available genomes, we mined more than 1000 putative enzymes and analysed their active site architecture and genomic neighbourhood. From there, we selected 37 representative PKS candidates for cell‐free expression and prototyping with a diverse set of Coenzyme A activated substrates, revealing unique patterns in substrate and cyclisation specificity, as well as the preferred number of malonyl‐Coenzyme A extensions. Using the 341 enzyme‐substrate pairs generated in this study, we trained a machine learning model to predict T3PKS substrate specificity and experimentally validated it with an extended panel of non‐natural substrates. In addition, we applied the model to identify two more promiscuous T3PKSs from fungi. We anticipate that the ML model will be useful for in silico screening of T3PKSs, while the insight into the product scope of these enzymes offers interesting starting points for further exploration.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 128 · Cited by 9
- Authors
- Sokolova, N., Denisov, S. S., Hackl, T., & Haslinger, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Groningen (NL)
- University of Vienna (AT)
- Corresponding author
- Haslinger, Kristina
- Venue
- Angewandte Chemie International Edition
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2025-09-04
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 44
- Pages
- e202514786-e202514786
- ISSN
- 1433-7851 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-3773
- PMC
- PMC12559476
- OpenAlex
- W4413995573
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 128
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 4.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Angewandte Chemie International Edition (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- European Commission (HORIZON2020, 893122)
- Rijksuniversiteit Groningen
- Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen
- HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions (101152560)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Microbial Metabolism and Applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Enzyme Production and Characterization
- Keywords
- type III polyketide synthase, fungal secondary metabolites, substrate specificity prediction, machine learning, active site structure, non-natural substrates, promiscuous enzymes, cell-free expression
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Fungi, Substrate Specificity, Catalytic Domain, Polyketide Synthases
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review