Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 174

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Criteria for rheological compatibility of polymer blends

Han, Chang Dae, Chuang, Hsiao‐Ken·1985·Journal of Applied Polymer Science

Abstract

Criteria for rheological compatibility of polymer blends are suggested. The criteria suggested make use of plots of first normal stress difference (N1) against shear stress (σ 12), and of storage modulus (G′) against loss modulus (G″). Compatible blend systems considered are (1) blends of two different grades of low‐density polyethylene, (2) blends of poly(vinylidene fluoride) and poly(methyl methacrylate), (3) blends of poly(2,6‐dimethyl‐1,4‐phenylene oxide) and polystyrene, and (4) blends of poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) and poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhyride). And incompatible blend systems considered are (1) blends of nylon 6 and poly(ethylene‐co‐vinyl acetate) and (2) blends of nylon 6 and an ethylene‐based multifunctional polymer. It has been found that plots of N1 vs. σ 12 and G′ vs. G″ give (a) temperature‐independent correlations for both compatible and incompatible blend systems; (b) composition‐independent correlations for compatible blends; (c) composition‐dependent correlations for incompatible blends.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/app.1985.070301118

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 174

Metadata

Authors
Han, C. D., & Chuang, H.
Venue
Journal of Applied Polymer Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1985-11
Volume
30
Issue
11
Pages
4431-4454
ISSN
  • 0021-8995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4628
OpenAlex
W2118241232
Cited by
174
References
0
FWCI
2.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Criteria for rheological compatibility of polymer blends. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/app.1985.070301118
The paper
Han, C. D., & Chuang, H. (1985). Criteria for rheological compatibility of polymer blends. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1985.070301118

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.