The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of the processing methods on the performance of polylactide films: Thermocompression versus solvent casting
Abstract
Polylactide (PLA) films were prepared by the thermocompression and solvent‐casting methods, and selected properties, such as the mechanical, water‐vapor‐barrier, thermal, and thermomechanical properties, were tested. The solvent‐cast films contained 13.7% solvent, which functioned as a plasticizer, as evidenced by the results of the measurements of dry matter and thermogravimetric analysis as well as dynamic mechanical analysis. The PLA films prepared by the thermocompression method were strong and brittle, with maximum tensile strength (σ max) and maximum elongation at break (ϵ max) values of 44.0 ± 2.2 MPa and 3.0 ± 0.1%, respectively; however, the solvent‐cast films were more ductile, with σ max and ϵ max values of 16.6 ± 1.0 MPa and 203.4 ± 20.8%, respectively. The water vapor permeability of the PLA films was lower than that of plastic films such as low‐density polyethylene and high‐density polyethylene but higher than that of commonly used biopolymer films. In addition, both types of tested PLA films were water‐resistant and not soluble in water. The thermocompressed films showed higher thermal stability than the solvent‐cast films. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 101: 3736–3742, 2006
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Literature Review of Poly(Lactic Acid)
Garlotta, D. (2001) · Journal of Polymers and the Environment · doi:10.1023/a:1020200822435 · Cited by 3,707
Bacterial Polyesters: Biosynthesis, Biodegradable Plastics and Biotechnology
Lenz, R. W., & Marchessault, R. H. (2005) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm049700c · Cited by 780
Cited by
Review of nanocellulose for sustainable future materials
Kim, J.-H., Shim, B. S., Kim, H. S., Lee, Y.-J., Min, S.-K., Jang, D., Abas, Z., & Kim, J. (2015) · International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology · doi:10.1007/s40684-015-0024-9 · Cited by 498
Poly(Lactic Acid)-Based Biomaterials: Synthesis, Modification and Applications
Xiao, L., Wang, B., Yang, G., & Gauthier, M. (2012) · Biomedical Science, Engineering and Technology · doi:10.5772/23927 · Cited by 277
Preparation and application of agar/alginate/collagen ternary blend functional food packaging films
Wang, L.-F., & Rhim, J.-W. (2015) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.07.007 · Cited by 265
Self-citationAdvances in guided bone regeneration membranes: a comprehensive review of materials and techniques
Ali, M., Mohd Noor, S. N. F., Mohamad, H., Ullah, F., Javed, F., & Abdul Hamid, Z. A. (2024) · Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express · doi:10.1088/2057-1976/ad1e75 · Cited by 19
Ni, C., Lu, R., Tao, L., Shi, G., Li, X., & Qin, C. (2015) · Polymer Bulletin · doi:10.1007/s00289-015-1353-0 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Rhim, J., Mohanty, A. K., Singh, S. P., & Ng, P. K. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Polymer Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-06-27
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 3736-3742
- ISSN
- 0021-8995 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-4628
- OpenAlex
- W2165927899
- Cited by
- 240
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.